Related Pages

Related topics: Entrypoints and Runtime Surface, Architecture Evidence Map, Operations and Verification Boundaries

Repository Overview

This page is generated from repository evidence because the Human Wiki provider was unavailable. It intentionally limits itself to README and file-tree facts.

README Evidence

<!-- mcp-name: io.github.detailobsessed/codereviewbuddy -->

codereviewbuddy

    

An MCP server that helps your AI coding agent manage PR review comments from any AI reviewer that uses GitHub's PR review infrastructure.

Features

Review comment management

• Triage review comments — triage_review_comments filters to only actionable inline threads and includes direct GitHub URLs for each comment
• Get thread details — get_thread fetches full conversation history for any thread by node ID
• Reply to anything — inline review threads (PRRT_), PR-level reviews (PRR_), and bot issue comments (IC_) all routed to the correct GitHub API

CI & stack diagnosis

• Diagnose CI failures — diagnose_ci collapses 3-5 sequential gh commands into one call: finds the failed run, identifies failed jobs/steps, and extracts actionable error lines
• Stack activity feed — stack_activity shows a chronological timeline of pushes, reviews, labels, merges across all PRs in a stack with a settled flag for deciding when to proceed
• Scan merged PRs — list_recent_unresolved catches late review comments on already-merged PRs

Agent experience

• Recovery-guided errors — every tool handler classifies errors (auth, rate limit, not found, workspace, GraphQL, config) and returns actionable recovery hints so agents self-correct instead of retrying blindly
• Next-action hints — tool responses include next_steps suggestions guiding agents to the right follow-up tool call
• Empty result messages — when results are empty, responses explain why and suggest what to try next
• GUI URLs — triage items include comment_url so agents can link users directly to the comment on GitHub
• **Tool classification tag

[excerpt truncated]

Selected Source Inventory

• README.md
• pyproject.toml
• src/codereviewbuddy/__init__.py
• src/codereviewbuddy/_instance.py
• src/codereviewbuddy/cache.py
• src/codereviewbuddy/cli.py
• src/codereviewbuddy/config.py
• src/codereviewbuddy/gh.py
• src/codereviewbuddy/github_api.py
• src/codereviewbuddy/install.py
• src/codereviewbuddy/models.py
• src/codereviewbuddy/server.py

Source: README.md:1-120

Related Pages

Related topics: Repository Overview, Architecture Evidence Map, Operations and Verification Boundaries

Entrypoints and Runtime Surface

The files below are the highest-signal candidates for how the project is installed, started, configured, or embedded. Treat this as an evidence map, not an inferred API contract.

Source: README.md:1-120

Related Pages

Related topics: Repository Overview, Entrypoints and Runtime Surface, Operations and Verification Boundaries

Architecture Evidence Map

This section maps source paths into likely architectural areas based on repository layout only. Claims that require execution are intentionally not made here.

• .: README.md, pyproject.toml
• src: src/codereviewbuddy/__init__.py, src/codereviewbuddy/_instance.py, src/codereviewbuddy/cache.py, src/codereviewbuddy/cli.py, src/codereviewbuddy/config.py, src/codereviewbuddy/gh.py

Source: pyproject.toml:1-120

Related Pages

Related topics: Repository Overview, Entrypoints and Runtime Surface, Architecture Evidence Map

Operations and Verification Boundaries

Operational guidance is limited to files that are present in the repository. Before using this project in an agent workflow, verify install, quickstart, and runtime behavior in a sandbox.

• Documentation signal: README.md
• Runtime/package signal: pyproject.toml
• Source inspection signal: src/codereviewbuddy/__init__.py
• Source inspection signal: src/codereviewbuddy/_instance.py
• Source inspection signal: src/codereviewbuddy/cache.py
• Source inspection signal: src/codereviewbuddy/cli.py
• Source inspection signal: src/codereviewbuddy/config.py
• Source inspection signal: src/codereviewbuddy/gh.py
• Source inspection signal: src/codereviewbuddy/github_api.py
• Source inspection signal: src/codereviewbuddy/install.py

Source: src/codereviewbuddy/__init__.py:1-120

Doramagic Pitfall Log

Doramagic extracted 6 source-linked risk signals. Review them before installing or handing real data to the project.

1. Capability assumption: README/documentation is current enough for a first validation pass.

• Severity: medium
• Finding: README/documentation is current enough for a first validation pass.
• User impact: The project should not be treated as fully validated until this signal is reviewed.
• Recommended check: Open the linked source, confirm whether it still applies to the current version, and keep the first run isolated.
• Evidence: capability.assumptions | mcp_registry:io.github.detailobsessed/codereviewbuddy:0.37.0 | https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers/io.github.detailobsessed%2Fcodereviewbuddy/versions/0.37.0 | README/documentation is current enough for a first validation pass.

2. Maintenance risk: Maintainer activity is unknown

• Severity: medium
• Finding: Maintenance risk is backed by a source signal: Maintainer activity is unknown. Treat it as a review item until the current version is checked.
• User impact: Users cannot judge support quality until recent activity, releases, and issue response are checked.
• Recommended check: Open the linked source, confirm whether it still applies to the current version, and keep the first run isolated.
• Evidence: evidence.maintainer_signals | mcp_registry:io.github.detailobsessed/codereviewbuddy:0.37.0 | https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers/io.github.detailobsessed%2Fcodereviewbuddy/versions/0.37.0 | last_activity_observed missing

3. Security or permission risk: no_demo

• Severity: medium
• Finding: no_demo
• User impact: The project may affect permissions, credentials, data exposure, or host boundaries.
• Recommended check: Open the linked source, confirm whether it still applies to the current version, and keep the first run isolated.
• Evidence: downstream_validation.risk_items | mcp_registry:io.github.detailobsessed/codereviewbuddy:0.37.0 | https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers/io.github.detailobsessed%2Fcodereviewbuddy/versions/0.37.0 | no_demo; severity=medium

4. Security or permission risk: no_demo

• Severity: medium
• Finding: no_demo
• User impact: The project may affect permissions, credentials, data exposure, or host boundaries.
• Recommended check: Open the linked source, confirm whether it still applies to the current version, and keep the first run isolated.
• Evidence: risks.scoring_risks | mcp_registry:io.github.detailobsessed/codereviewbuddy:0.37.0 | https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers/io.github.detailobsessed%2Fcodereviewbuddy/versions/0.37.0 | no_demo; severity=medium

5. Maintenance risk: issue_or_pr_quality=unknown

• Severity: low
• Finding: issue_or_pr_quality=unknown。
• User impact: Users cannot judge support quality until recent activity, releases, and issue response are checked.
• Recommended check: Open the linked source, confirm whether it still applies to the current version, and keep the first run isolated.
• Evidence: evidence.maintainer_signals | mcp_registry:io.github.detailobsessed/codereviewbuddy:0.37.0 | https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers/io.github.detailobsessed%2Fcodereviewbuddy/versions/0.37.0 | issue_or_pr_quality=unknown

6. Maintenance risk: release_recency=unknown

• Severity: low
• Finding: release_recency=unknown。
• User impact: Users cannot judge support quality until recent activity, releases, and issue response are checked.
• Recommended check: Open the linked source, confirm whether it still applies to the current version, and keep the first run isolated.
• Evidence: evidence.maintainer_signals | mcp_registry:io.github.detailobsessed/codereviewbuddy:0.37.0 | https://registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0.1/servers/io.github.detailobsessed%2Fcodereviewbuddy/versions/0.37.0 | release_recency=unknown

Community Discussion Evidence

Doramagic exposes project-level community discussion separately from official documentation. Review these links before using codereviewbuddy with real data or production workflows.

• 0.37.0 - github / github_release
• 0.36.0 - github / github_release
• 0.35.2 - github / github_release
• 0.35.1 - github / github_release
• 0.35.0 - github / github_release
• 0.32.0 - github / github_release
• 0.31.0 - github / github_release
• 0.30.1 - github / github_release
• README/documentation is current enough for a first validation pass. - GitHub / issue