# continuum - Doramagic AI Context Pack

> Purpose: pre-work context for the user's host AI. This pack does not prove that the project has been installed, run, or validated.

## Project

- canonical_name: `nikhilkagita04/continuum`
- capability: Context dies when you switch apps. Continuum is an open, local-first memory layer for your Mac — it remembers what you do in every app (on-device) and hands it to any AI over MCP. Ask Claude what you were just doing in another tab, and it knows.
- expected_user_outcome: Context dies when you switch apps. Continuum is an open, local-first memory layer for your Mac — it remembers what you do in every app (on-device) and hands it to any AI over MCP. Ask Claude what you were just doing in another tab, and it knows.

## Operating Boundaries

- Do not claim that the project has been installed, run, called through an API, or used on local files unless separate evidence proves it.
- Project facts must come from repo evidence, Claim Graph, or explicit source references.
- When a capability is not verified, mark it as unverified instead of completing it as fact.
- publish_status: `publishable`
- blocking_gaps: none

---

## Doramagic Context Augmentation

The following sections strengthen the repository context for a host AI. Human Manual data is a reading route, and pitfall notes become operating constraints.

## Human Manual Outline

Usage rule: this is only a reading route and salience signal, not factual authority. Concrete claims must still return to repo evidence or Claim Graph.

Host AI hard rules:
- Do not treat page titles, section order, summaries, or importance values as factual project evidence.
- When explaining the Human Manual outline, state that it is only a reading route or salience signal.
- Capability, installation, compatibility, runtime state, and risk claims must cite repo evidence, source paths, or Claim Graph.

- **Introduction and Quickstart**: importance `high`
  - source_paths: README.md, package.json, bin/continuum.mjs, CONTRIBUTING.md
- **The Four-Stage Pipeline**: importance `high`
  - source_paths: daemon/pipeline.mjs, daemon/stage1/capture.swift, daemon/stage1/screen.swift, daemon/stage1/files.mjs, daemon/stage2/segmenter.mjs
- **Capture Quality, Noise Filtering, and Self-Exclusion**: importance `high`
  - source_paths: daemon/stage1/capture.swift, daemon/stage1/screen.swift, daemon/stage4/distill.mjs, daemon/pipeline.mjs, docs/architecture/capture-quality.md
- **MCP Server, Graph Sidecar, and Custom Tools**: importance `medium`
  - source_paths: daemon/mcp-server.mjs, backend/graphiti/sidecar.py, backend/graphiti/README.md, examples/claude-desktop.json, examples/standup.mjs

## Repo Inspection Evidence

- repo_clone_verified: true
- repo_inspection_verified: true
- repo_commit: `3f5b20bb92f2501cf42e92661b7925bfdacd941d`
- inspected_files: `README.md`, `package.json`, `docs/architecture/capture-quality.md`, `docs/architecture/ingestion-pipeline.md`, `examples/claude-desktop.json`

Host AI hard rules:
- Without repo_clone_verified=true, do not claim that the source code has been read.
- Without repo_inspection_verified=true, do not write README, docs, or package-file conclusions as facts.
- Without quick_start_verified=true, do not claim that the Quick Start path has run successfully.

## Doramagic Pitfall Constraints

These rules come from Doramagic discovery, validation, or compilation findings. The host AI must treat them as operating constraints, not background notes.

### Constraint 1: Configuration risk requires verification

- Trigger: Project evidence flags a configuration risk. Review the linked source before relying on this workflow.
- Host AI rule: Reproduce the official install and quickstart path in an isolated environment.
- Why it matters: May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.
- Evidence: capability.host_targets | https://github.com/nikhilkagita04/continuum
- Hard boundary: Do not present this pitfall as solved, verified, or ignorable unless later evidence explicitly closes it.

### Constraint 2: Configuration risk requires verification

- Trigger: Developers should check this configuration risk before relying on the project: Capture: LLM structuring pass to attribute episodes (who said what)
- Host AI rule: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Capture: LLM structuring pass to attribute episodes (who said what). Context: Source discussion did not expose a precise runtime context.
- Why it matters: Developers may misconfigure credentials, environment, or host setup: Capture: LLM structuring pass to attribute episodes (who said what)
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | https://github.com/nikhilkagita04/continuum/issues/2
- Hard boundary: Do not present this pitfall as solved, verified, or ignorable unless later evidence explicitly closes it.

### Constraint 3: Configuration risk requires verification

- Trigger: Developers should check this configuration risk before relying on the project: Capture: emit AX focused-element as clean user-authored text
- Host AI rule: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Capture: emit AX focused-element as clean user-authored text. Context: Observed when using macos
- Why it matters: Developers may misconfigure credentials, environment, or host setup: Capture: emit AX focused-element as clean user-authored text
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | https://github.com/nikhilkagita04/continuum/issues/1
- Hard boundary: Do not present this pitfall as solved, verified, or ignorable unless later evidence explicitly closes it.

### Constraint 4: Capability evidence risk requires verification

- Trigger: README/documentation is current enough for a first validation pass.
- Host AI rule: Reproduce the official install and quickstart path in an isolated environment.
- Why it matters: May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.
- Evidence: capability.assumptions | https://github.com/nikhilkagita04/continuum
- Hard boundary: Do not present this pitfall as solved, verified, or ignorable unless later evidence explicitly closes it.

### Constraint 5: Maintenance risk requires verification

- Trigger: Project evidence flags a maintenance risk. Review the linked source before relying on this workflow.
- Host AI rule: Reproduce the official install and quickstart path in an isolated environment.
- Why it matters: May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.
- Evidence: evidence.maintainer_signals | https://github.com/nikhilkagita04/continuum
- Hard boundary: Do not present this pitfall as solved, verified, or ignorable unless later evidence explicitly closes it.

### Constraint 6: Security or permission risk requires verification

- Trigger: no_demo
- Host AI rule: Reproduce the official install and quickstart path in an isolated environment.
- Why it matters: May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.
- Evidence: downstream_validation.risk_items | https://github.com/nikhilkagita04/continuum
- Hard boundary: Do not present this pitfall as solved, verified, or ignorable unless later evidence explicitly closes it.

### Constraint 7: Security or permission risk requires verification

- Trigger: no_demo
- Host AI rule: Reproduce the official install and quickstart path in an isolated environment.
- Why it matters: May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.
- Evidence: risks.scoring_risks | https://github.com/nikhilkagita04/continuum
- Hard boundary: Do not present this pitfall as solved, verified, or ignorable unless later evidence explicitly closes it.

### Constraint 8: Security or permission risk requires verification

- Trigger: Project evidence flags a security or permission risk. Review the linked source before relying on this workflow.
- Host AI rule: Reproduce the official install and quickstart path in an isolated environment.
- Why it matters: May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | https://github.com/nikhilkagita04/continuum/issues/2
- Hard boundary: Do not present this pitfall as solved, verified, or ignorable unless later evidence explicitly closes it.

### Constraint 9: Security or permission risk requires verification

- Trigger: Project evidence flags a security or permission risk. Review the linked source before relying on this workflow.
- Host AI rule: Reproduce the official install and quickstart path in an isolated environment.
- Why it matters: May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | https://github.com/nikhilkagita04/continuum/issues/1
- Hard boundary: Do not present this pitfall as solved, verified, or ignorable unless later evidence explicitly closes it.

### Constraint 10: Capability evidence risk requires verification

- Trigger: Developers should check this conceptual risk before relying on the project: Capture: exclude Continuum's own windows (dashboard/terminal) from capture
- Host AI rule: Reproduce the official install and quickstart path in an isolated environment.
- Why it matters: Developers may hit a documented source-backed failure mode: Capture: exclude Continuum's own windows (dashboard/terminal) from capture
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | https://github.com/nikhilkagita04/continuum/issues/4
- Hard boundary: Do not present this pitfall as solved, verified, or ignorable unless later evidence explicitly closes it.
