Doramagic Project Pack · Human Manual

gptme

Your agent in your terminal, equipped with local tools: writes code, uses the terminal, browses the web. Make your own persistent autonomous agent on top!

Project Overview and Architecture

Related topics: Tools, LLM Providers, and RAG, Server, Web UI, and Desktop, Extensibility, Plugins, and Autonomous Agents

Section Related Pages

Continue reading this section for the full explanation and source context.

Related topics: Tools, LLM Providers, and RAG, Server, Web UI, and Desktop, Extensibility, Plugins, and Autonomous Agents

Project Overview and Architecture

Purpose and Scope

gptme is an open-source personal AI agent delivered as a monorepo that bundles a Python agent core, a Flask-based HTTP server, a React/TypeScript web UI, a Tauri desktop wrapper, and a Chrome MV3 browser extension. The architecture is intentionally multi-surface: the same agent and tool registry can be driven from a CLI, a browser tab, a native desktop window, or an HTTP API, while sharing the same on-disk conversation store.

The latest tracked release, v0.31.1.dev20260622, ships 88 new features in a single cycle, reflecting an active pace of development across the UI, server, tooling, and evaluation layers. Recent community interest has focused on three areas: extending the patch tool with hash-anchored editing to survive line drift (issue #2667), enabling RAG over code and past conversations (issue #59), and adding Windows support (issue #73).

System Architecture

The gptme monorepo is composed of several cooperating subprojects, each with its own build and packaging metadata.

ComponentPathStackRole
Agent coregptme/PythonLLM orchestration, tool execution, conversation log
HTTP servergptme/server/FlaskREST API v2, OpenAPI docs, auth, telemetry
Web UIwebui/React + ViteIn-browser chat client
Desktop apptauri/Tauri + Rust + NodeBundled webui + sidecar gptme-server
Browser extensionwebui/extension/Chrome MV3 + esbuildSide-panel chat, content-script capture
Evaluationgptme/eval/dspy/DSPyPrompt optimization and behavioral evals

The desktop package is declared in tauri/package.json (Tauri CLI ^2) and built via the root Makefile targets make tauri-dev and make tauri-build, with the actual server binary produced by tauri/scripts/build-sidecar.sh and bundled into tauri/bins/.

flowchart LR
    User[User] --> CLI[gptme CLI]
    User --> WebUI[webui / React]
    User --> Ext[Chrome Extension]
    User --> Desktop[Tauri Desktop App]
    WebUI -->|HTTP/JSON| Server[gptme-server Flask]
    Ext -->|HTTP/JSON| Server
    Desktop -->|bundled sidecar| Server
    CLI --> Agent[gptme agent core]
    Server --> Agent
    Agent --> Tools[Tool Registry]
    Agent --> Eval[gptme/eval/dspy]
    Server --> Log[(Conversation logs)]

The Server Layer

The server entry point is the gptme-server Click command implemented in gptme/server/cli.py. It initializes the agent via init(...), optionally in degraded mode when no API keys are configured, wires up telemetry with init_telemetry(...), prints an authentication token via init_auth(...), installs a SIGTERM handler for clean container shutdown, and finally runs the Flask app.

The V2 API is split into focused modules under gptme/server/:

  • api_v2.py — conversation CRUD, model/provider metadata, and config endpoints.
  • api_v2_common.py — shared validators for conversation_id and branch names, with explicit path-traversal protection and a NAME_MAX-aware byte budget so on-disk paths like branches/{name}.jsonl never exceed filesystem limits.
  • tools_api.py — exposes GET /api/v2/tools so the webui can render a FunctionBrowser panel describing each tool's name, description, block types, MCP provenance, and parameter schema.
  • artifacts_api.py — classifies artifacts by extension and MIME type, derives stable art_<sha1[:12]> ids from logdir-relative paths, and reconstructs file-writing operations from both Markdown code blocks (save, append, patch, morph, patch_many) and XML <tool_use> payloads to produce unified diffs.

OpenAPI documentation is generated automatically. The api_doc decorator in gptme/server/openapi_docs.py infers summary/description from docstrings, response/request types from annotations, and tags from the module path, then walks Flask routes at spec-generation time to emit a complete openapi: 3.0.3 document served under /openapi.json.

Client Surfaces

The web UI and browser extension share a single Vite build configured to emit two entries: a main app and a panel entry that wraps ExtensionChat. As described in webui/extension/README.md, the service worker (background.ts) and content script (content/content.ts) are compiled separately with esbuild because they cannot ship React, while the side panel reuses the shared component library. The extension's package.json pins typescript ^5.6.0 and esbuild ^0.24.0 for that lightweight pipeline.

The desktop app, documented in tauri/README.md, packages the built webui together with a PyInstaller sidecar of gptme-server. The Rust backend (src-tauri/) owns the app lifecycle and IPC; the actual agent runs in the bundled Python process so end users never need to install Python or manage dependencies themselves.

Evaluation and Prompt Optimization

The gptme/eval/dspy/ module, described in gptme/eval/dspy/README.md, applies the DSPy framework to automatically improve gptme's system prompts. It evaluates across task success rate, tool-usage effectiveness, and LLM-judged response quality, then uses MIPROv2 (Bayesian instruction search plus few-shot bootstrapping) or BootstrapFewShot to propose improvements. Known findings documented there include a tool-usage metric that always reports 0.000 despite successful task completion, and the observation that MIPROv2 can lift scores without changing the final prompt text, suggesting the optimization sometimes improves the process rather than the artifact.

See Also

  • Tools Reference — every block type the agent can invoke
  • Server API Reference — full OpenAPI schema and authentication model
  • Tauri Desktop Build Guide — sidecar bundling details
  • Browser Extension Guide — side-panel development workflow
  • DSPy Prompt Optimization — evaluation harness and known issues

Source: https://github.com/gptme/gptme / Human Manual

Tools, LLM Providers, and RAG

Related topics: Project Overview and Architecture, Extensibility, Plugins, and Autonomous Agents

Section Related Pages

Continue reading this section for the full explanation and source context.

Section Tool API surface

Continue reading this section for the full explanation and source context.

Section File-writing tools and the patchanchored proposal

Continue reading this section for the full explanation and source context.

Section Tool selection from the CLI

Continue reading this section for the full explanation and source context.

Related topics: Project Overview and Architecture, Extensibility, Plugins, and Autonomous Agents

Tools, LLM Providers, and RAG

gptme is an agent runtime built around three cooperating subsystems: a tool registry that defines what the agent can do in the local environment, an LLM provider layer that abstracts model selection across vendors, and a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) story that is actively being shaped by community contributions. This page describes each subsystem as it is exposed in the server, CLI, and web UI, and links the high-traffic community issues that drive its evolution.

Tool System

The tool registry is the agent's capability palette. Each tool declares a name, a one-line description, full instructions shown to the model, the code-block types it handles, and a typed parameter schema. The server exposes that catalog as a JSON API so the web UI can render a *FunctionBrowser* panel that mirrors the agent's live capabilities.

Tool API surface

The V2 server mounts a Flask blueprint that serves the tool list with authentication enforced by require_auth. Source: gptme/server/tools_api.py:18-38.

FieldTypeMeaning
namestrTool identifier; also the block-type prefix
descstrOne-line summary shown in pickers
instructionsstrFull system-prompt text for the tool
block_typeslist[str]Markdown code-block tags (e.g. shell, bash)
is_mcpboolProvided by an MCP server
is_availableboolCurrently usable in this session
disabled_by_defaultboolExcluded from default sessions

Parameter introspection is modeled by ToolParameterOut (name, type, description, required). Source: gptme/server/tools_api.py:21-26.

File-writing tools and the `patch_anchored` proposal

The artifact pipeline distinguishes a closed set of file-writing tools: save, append, patch, morph, and patch_many. Source: gptme/server/artifacts_api.py:5-11. Of these, only save creates a new file and only patch_many may target multiple paths in a single tool invocation. The artifact API recovers these operations from both fenced markdown blocks and XML tool-use tokens so it can render unified diffs in the chat timeline. Source: gptme/server/artifacts_api.py:21-39.

A community proposal (#2667) asks for a sibling patch_anchored tool whose ORIGINAL/REPLACEMENT blocks are addressed by content hashes rather than literal line ranges, so a sequence of edits to the same file no longer drifts as earlier hunks shift line numbers. The motivation cited in the issue is the current patch tool's behaviour where every ORIGINAL block re-matches from the top of the file, causing sequential edits in one file to drift.

Tool selection from the CLI

The gptme-server CLI accepts a comma-separated --tools allowlist and forwards it to init_tools as a tool_allowlist and a tool_format="markdown" marker. Source: gptme/server/cli.py:62-71. This is the entry point users use to disable risky tools or to scope the agent to a narrow workflow when running headless.

LLM Providers

Provider configuration lives in gptme/llm/ and is surfaced through the V2 API. The relevant module exports a PROVIDERS registry, helpers to enumerate available providers, and functions to get/set a default model and recommend a model for the user's hardware and key set. Source: gptme/server/api_v2.py:41-54.

Key abstractions:

  • list_available_providers() — filtered to those with valid credentials in the user's config.
  • get_default_model() / set_default_model() — read and persist the chosen model id.
  • get_recommended_model() — heuristic selection when the user has not configured one.
  • _apply_model_filters() / _get_models_for_provider() — internal filtering applied to remote catalogs.
  • OPENROUTER_APP_HEADERS — constant identifying the OpenRouter integration. Source: gptme/server/api_v2.py:39.

Credentials are loaded via gptme.credentials.get_stored_api_key, and the API root handler reports list_available_providers() so the web UI can populate its provider picker. Source: gptme/server/api_v2.py:38-42. When the server is launched with no keys configured, the CLI still starts in *degraded mode* so the user can configure a provider through the UI. Source: gptme/server/cli.py:65-71.

Provider data flow

flowchart LR
  UI[Web UI Provider Picker] -->|/api/v2/providers| API[api_v2.py]
  API -->|list_available_providers| LLM[llm/models.py]
  LLM -->|PROVIDERS + filters| API
  API -->|JSON list| UI
  User[User config / env] --> Creds[credentials.get_stored_api_key]
  Creds --> LLM

The web UI ships as a multi-backend client that connects to one or more gptme-server instances, each with its own provider configuration. Source: webui/README.md:9-21.

RAG support is one of the most-discussed topics in the community. Issue #59 requests retrieval over project folders, plain-text notes, past conversations, and previously web-retrieved documents, with the stated goal of returning gptme to its roots as an agent that has long-term context about the user and their projects.

In the v0.31.1.dev20260622 release, gptme ships a first step in that direction: a new context search-conversations CLI subcommand that performs RAG-style search over stored conversations. This is the most direct evidence in the release notes that conversation-level retrieval is now a first-class surface.

The DSPy evaluation module complements this direction: it uses MIPROv2 and BootstrapFewShot to optimize gptme's system prompts against task-success and tool-usage metrics, and stores the results as artifacts that future RAG indexes could consume. Source: gptme/eval/dspy/README.md:60-75. The README documents a known issue where the tool-usage metric always reads 0.000, indicating the metric in metrics.py needs further work — a useful pointer for anyone extending RAG evaluation.

See Also

  • gptme/server/openapi_docs.py — OpenAPI schema generation for the V2 endpoints.
  • gptme/server/api_v2_common.py — shared validators for conversation ids and branch names.
  • gptme/eval/dspy/README.md — prompt optimization harness used to benchmark tool behavior.
  • webui/README.md — deployment modes for the web UI, including the multi-backend configuration relevant to swapping providers and RAG backends.
  • Community: Issue #59 (Add RAG for code, personal files, and conversations), Issue #2667 (patch_anchored tool proposal).

Source: https://github.com/gptme/gptme / Human Manual

Server, Web UI, and Desktop

Related topics: Project Overview and Architecture, Extensibility, Plugins, and Autonomous Agents

Section Related Pages

Continue reading this section for the full explanation and source context.

Related topics: Project Overview and Architecture, Extensibility, Plugins, and Autonomous Agents

Server, Web UI, and Desktop

gptme ships as a monorepo with three coordinated delivery surfaces: a Flask-based HTTP server that exposes the agent's conversation, tool, and artifact APIs; a React/Vite web UI that consumes those APIs; and a Tauri-based native desktop app that bundles both into a standalone binary. A fourth surface, a Chrome MV3 extension, reuses the same web UI for in-browser use. Together they let users run gptme locally, in containers, on remote VMs, or as a packaged desktop application against a shared HTTP backend.

Architecture at a Glance

The three surfaces share a single source-of-truth: the server's V2 REST API. The web UI and Tauri shell are thin presentation layers; the agent runtime, tool registry, and conversation log live entirely behind the server.

flowchart LR
  subgraph Clients
    UI[webui<br/>React + Vite]
    Tauri[tauri shell<br/>Rust + WebView]
    Ext[Chrome extension<br/>MV3 side panel]
    CLI[gptme CLI]
  end
  subgraph Server[gptme-server · Flask]
    API[v2 API<br/>api_v2.py]
    Tools[tools_api]
    Artifacts[artifacts_api]
    OpenAPI[openapi_docs]
    Auth[auth + token]
  end
  subgraph Agent[Agent Runtime]
    LLM[LLM providers]
    ToolsReg[Tool registry]
    Log[Conversation log<br/>JSONL]
  end
  UI -- "REST + Bearer" --> API
  Tauri -- "REST + Bearer" --> API
  Ext -- "REST + Bearer" --> API
  CLI -- "in-process" --> Agent
  API --> Auth
  API --> Tools
  API --> Artifacts
  API --> Agent
  ToolsReg --> Agent
  OpenAPI -. documents .-> API

gptme-server (Backend)

The server is a Flask application started via the gptme-server CLI entry point. It can boot in two modes: an authenticated mode that requires API keys for LLM providers, and a "degraded" mode that boots without keys so the SetupWizard can prompt the user to configure one through the UI. Source: gptme/server/cli.py:50-90

The V2 API surface is defined in gptme/server/api_v2.py and provides conversation CRUD, session management, and tool execution. Common helpers enforce filesystem-safety rules that are reused across blueprints; for example, _validate_conversation_id enforces a 255-byte limit and rejects path-traversal attempts, returning 400 Bad Request with a stable message. Source: gptme/server/api_v2_common.py:24-40

Auxiliary blueprints expose specific subsystems:

  • Tools registryGET /api/v2/tools returns a ToolOut payload describing the agent's current tool palette (name, description, block types, parameter schema, MCP origin, availability, default-disabled flag) so the webui can render a FunctionBrowser panel. Source: gptme/server/tools_api.py:14-65
  • Artifacts — Recovered file writes from message history (markdown code blocks or XML tool-use blocks for save, append, patch, morph, patch_many) are classified into kinds by extension and MIME type, hashed into stable ids, and indexed by the originating message. Source: gptme/server/artifacts_api.py:60-140
  • OpenAPI docs — The api_doc decorator auto-infers summary, description, request/response schemas, and tags from docstrings, type hints, and Flask route metadata, then composes a live OpenAPI spec for the UI and external clients. Source: gptme/server/openapi_docs.py:30-160

Authentication is delegated to init_auth, which issues a bearer token on first run; gptme-server token prints it for use in an Authorization: Bearer header. Source: gptme/server/cli.py:100-130

A SIGTERM handler routes container shutdowns (systemctl stop, Kubernetes scale-down) through the same clean-shutdown path as Ctrl+C so telemetry flushing and the Flask finally block always run. Source: gptme/server/cli.py:88-95

gptme-webui (Frontend)

The web UI is a Vite-built React SPA that talks to one or more gptme-server instances. Its standout capability is multi-backend mode: a single browser tab can connect to several servers (local dev on http://127.0.0.1:5700, a remote workstation, a hosted chat.gptme.org instance, or the managed gptme.ai service) and unify their conversations. Source: webui/README.md:8-22

A demo mode reads bundled conversation logs without a live server, useful for sharing reproducible artifacts; live fetches are suppressed in this mode. Source: webui/README.md:12-20

A SetupWizard is launched from a "disconnected" banner on first visit when the UI cannot reach a configured server, guiding the user through API-key provisioning and provider selection. Source: webui/README.md:14-22

gptme-tauri (Desktop)

tauri/ wraps the web UI and a bundled gptme-server PyInstaller sidecar into a native desktop binary. The Rust shell handles app lifecycle, IPC, and sidecar process management, so end users do not need to install Python or manage dependencies. Source: tauri/README.md:6-16

Development and build are driven from the repo root:

make tauri-dev           # builds webui, starts Tauri dev server
make tauri-build-sidecar # PyInstaller → bins/gptme-server (gitignored)
make tauri-build         # produces bundle in src-tauri/target/release/bundle/

Source: tauri/README.md:22-48. The Tauri CLI is pinned to @tauri-apps/cli ^2 in tauri/package.json.

Chrome Extension

A Manifest V3 extension lives at webui/extension/. The side panel reuses the shared React components via the webui's multi-entry Vite build (panel.htmlExtensionChat.tsx), while the service worker and content script are standalone TypeScript compiled with esbuild. A selection-capture content script lets users highlight text on any page and ask gptme about it via the side panel. Source: webui/extension/README.md:6-28

Deployment Modes

ModeBackendClientUse case
Local devgptme-server on 127.0.0.1:5700webui Vite dev serverContributor workflow
DesktopBundled sidecartauri shellEnd-user without Python
Hosted (open)User-supplied serverchat.gptme.orgShare a server, keep keys
Cloud (managed)Auto-discovered via gptme.ai authgptme.aiNo server setup
Custom remoteVM/workstationwebui multi-backendAggregate remote agents
DemoNone (bundled JSONL)webui demo modeShareable reproductions
BrowserAny reachable serverChrome extension side panelInline web assistance

Source: webui/README.md:10-22, tauri/README.md:6-16, webui/extension/README.md:6-12.

Common Failure Modes

  • No API keys at boot — the server starts in degraded mode and the UI must guide configuration; otherwise tool calls that need an LLM will fail. Source: gptme/server/cli.py:50-75
  • Path-traversal / oversized ids — rejected at the API boundary with 400 Bad Request and a stable message; clients should surface this verbatim. Source: gptme/server/api_v2_common.py:24-50
  • Windows compatibility — historically blocked by readline; the desktop bundle via PyInstaller + Tauri is the recommended path on Windows until upstream fixes land. Source: community issue #73
  • Long patch sequences drift — the patch tool re-matches ORIGINAL blocks against a moving line offset, which motivated the proposed patch_anchored (hash-anchored, atomic verify-apply) tool. Source: community issue #2667

See Also

Source: https://github.com/gptme/gptme / Human Manual

Extensibility, Plugins, and Autonomous Agents

Related topics: Project Overview and Architecture, Tools, LLM Providers, and RAG, Server, Web UI, and Desktop

Section Related Pages

Continue reading this section for the full explanation and source context.

Section 2.1 Plugin discovery

Continue reading this section for the full explanation and source context.

Section 2.2 Tool metadata exposed to clients

Continue reading this section for the full explanation and source context.

Section 2.3 File-editing tools and the patch family

Continue reading this section for the full explanation and source context.

Related topics: Project Overview and Architecture, Tools, LLM Providers, and RAG, Server, Web UI, and Desktop

Extensibility, Plugins, and Autonomous Agents

gptme is designed as an extensible agent runtime where the tool palette, lifecycle behavior, and execution loop can be customized without modifying core code. This page documents the three cooperating subsystems that make that possible: the plugin/tool registry, the hooks system, and the autonomous session/tasks engine that drives the agent loop.

1. Purpose and Scope

The extensibility layer serves three goals:

flowchart LR
    A[Plugin entrypoint] --> B[Plugin registry]
    B --> C[Tool registry<br/>get_available_tools]
    C --> D[Tools API<br/>GET /api/v2/tools]
    H[Hooks registry] --> S[Session step executor]
    T[Tasks API] --> S
    S --> R[Conversation log<br/>+ branches]
    D --> UI[WebUI / Tauri / Extension]

2. Plugins and the Tool Registry

2.1 Plugin discovery

Plugins are loaded through Python entry points and assembled in the registry. Source: gptme/plugins/__init__.py; gptme/plugins/registry.py; gptme/plugins/entrypoints.py. A plugin typically contributes one or more Tool subclasses that are registered under a name (e.g. shell, patch, patch_many, morph, save, append). The registry is the single source of truth consumed by both the CLI and the server. Source: gptme/server/tools_api.py:9-13from ..tools import get_available_tools.

2.2 Tool metadata exposed to clients

Each tool is described by a ToolOut model so the WebUI, Tauri shell, and Chrome MV3 extension can render the same palette. Source: gptme/server/tools_api.py:30-50.

FieldMeaning
nameTool name, also the block-type prefix the agent emits (e.g. shell).
descOne-line summary shown in the Function Browser.
instructionsFull usage text given to the model.
block_typesCode-block language tags the tool handles (['shell', 'bash']).
is_mcpTool is provided via Model Context Protocol.
is_availableWhether the tool is usable in the current session (e.g. missing credentials).
disabled_by_defaultExcluded from default sessions; user must opt in.

Source: gptme/server/tools_api.py:30-50.

2.3 File-editing tools and the patch family

File-writing tools form a small, well-defined set the rest of the system relies on: save, append, patch, patch_many, morph. Source: gptme/server/artifacts_api.py:1-80_FILE_WRITE_TOOLS = {"save", "append", "patch", "morph", "patch_many"}. The community has been actively requesting a patch_anchored tool — hash-anchored editing that survives line-number drift between sequential edits — illustrating the extensibility pressure on this surface area. Source: GitHub issue #2667.

3. Hooks: Gating and Lifecycle Interception

The hooks subsystem lets hosts observe and modify the agent loop. Two concrete entry points are visible in the runtime:

Hook handlers are registered centrally so plugin authors and embedding hosts (server, WebUI, Tauri) share the same lifecycle. Source: gptme/hooks/registry.py.

4. Autonomous Agent Execution

4.1 Session step loop

The autonomous loop lives in gptme.server.session_step. It separates *how* steps are generated and tools executed (this module) from the Flask routes in api_v2_sessions.py and the data models in session_models.py. Source: gptme/server/session_step.py:1-12. The module wires together:

  • LLM streaming/chat completion (_chat_complete, _stream).
  • Message preparation (prepare_messages) and LogManager for conversation state.
  • Tool acquisition (get_tools) and an ACP runtime for external agent processes.
  • Telemetry (trace_function) and a background health monitor for ACP. Source: gptme/server/session_step.py:32-60.

The workspace is materialized via prepare_execution_environment and the shell tool's set_workspace_cwd so each step runs in a deterministic directory. Source: gptme/server/session_step.py:18-30.

4.2 Tasks for parallel autonomy

Long-running or parallel work is modeled as Task metadata that references one or more conversations. Source: gptme/server/tasks_api.py:30-55. Status transitions (pending → active → completed | failed) let the WebUI surface background progress, and archived keeps the registry clean without losing provenance. Workspace and git context are *derived* from the active conversation rather than duplicated, keeping Tasks lightweight. Source: gptme/server/tasks_api.py:55-80.

4.3 Server CLI wiring

The server CLI ties everything together: it initializes the tool allowlist, registers a fallback model for degraded startup, configures telemetry, and authenticates the HTTP layer before app.run. Source: gptme/server/cli.py:1-50. It also routes SIGTERM through the same clean-shutdown path as Ctrl+C, ensuring telemetry is flushed and session state is consistent on container scale-down. Source: gptme/server/cli.py:30-50.

4.4 Prompt optimization for autonomy

Autonomous behavior quality depends on the system prompt. The DSPy integration under gptme/eval/dspy/ provides automated prompt optimization with MIPROv2 (Bayesian instruction search) and BootstrapFewShot (example bootstrapping), driven by composite metrics covering task success, tool effectiveness, and LLM-judged quality. Source: gptme/eval/dspy/README.md. Recent releases also expand RAG-style context — e.g. a context search-conversations subcommand — directly addressing the long-standing community request to give the agent memory of past projects and notes. Source: v0.31.1.dev20260622 release notes; GitHub issue #59.

Common Failure Modes

  • Plugin not loaded: Tool missing from GET /api/v2/tools — check entrypoint registration and disabled_by_default. Source: gptme/server/tools_api.py:30-50.
  • Patch drift in long sessions: Sequential patch operations can shift line numbers; this is the motivation behind the proposed patch_anchored tool. Source: GitHub issue #2667.
  • Stuck ACP process: The health monitor thread restarts unhealthy ACP runtimes on a 30-second cadence. Source: gptme/server/session_step.py:50-60.
  • DSPy metric bug: Known issue where tool usage score reports 0.000 despite successful tool-using tasks — under investigation. Source: gptme/eval/dspy/README.md — Known Issues.

See Also

  • Tools and Capabilities
  • Server API Reference
  • Hooks and Lifecycle Events
  • Sessions, Tasks, and Branches
  • DSPy Prompt Optimization

Source: https://github.com/gptme/gptme / Human Manual

Doramagic Pitfall Log

Source-linked risks stay visible on the manual page so the preview does not read like a recommendation.

high Security or permission risk requires verification

May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.

medium Installation risk requires verification

Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v0.31.1.dev20260525

medium Installation risk requires verification

Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v0.31.1.dev20260604

medium Installation risk requires verification

May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.

Doramagic Pitfall Log

Found 21 structured pitfall item(s), including 1 high/blocking item(s). Top priority: Security or permission risk - Security or permission risk requires verification.

1. Security or permission risk: Security or permission risk requires verification

  • Severity: high
  • Finding: Project evidence flags a security or permission risk. Review the linked source before relying on this workflow.
  • User impact: May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.
  • Recommended check: Reproduce the official install and quickstart path in an isolated environment.
  • Evidence: community_evidence:github | https://github.com/gptme/gptme/issues/2667

2. Installation risk: Installation risk requires verification

  • Severity: medium
  • Finding: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: v0.31.1.dev20260525
  • User impact: Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v0.31.1.dev20260525
  • Recommended check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: v0.31.1.dev20260525. Context: Observed during installation or first-run setup.
  • Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_release | https://github.com/gptme/gptme/releases/tag/v0.31.1.dev20260525

3. Installation risk: Installation risk requires verification

  • Severity: medium
  • Finding: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: v0.31.1.dev20260604
  • User impact: Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v0.31.1.dev20260604
  • Recommended check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: v0.31.1.dev20260604. Context: Source discussion did not expose a precise runtime context.
  • Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_release | https://github.com/gptme/gptme/releases/tag/v0.31.1.dev20260604

4. Installation risk: Installation risk requires verification

  • Severity: medium
  • Finding: Project evidence flags a installation risk. Review the linked source before relying on this workflow.
  • User impact: May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.
  • Recommended check: Reproduce the official install and quickstart path in an isolated environment.
  • Evidence: community_evidence:github | https://github.com/gptme/gptme/issues/2982

5. Configuration risk: Configuration risk requires verification

  • Severity: medium
  • Finding: Project evidence flags a configuration risk. Review the linked source before relying on this workflow.
  • User impact: May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.
  • Recommended check: Reproduce the official install and quickstart path in an isolated environment.
  • Evidence: capability.host_targets | https://github.com/gptme/gptme

6. Configuration risk: Configuration risk requires verification

  • Severity: medium
  • Finding: Developers should check this configuration risk before relying on the project: feat(patch): add patch_anchored tool — hash-anchored editing with atomic verify-apply
  • User impact: Developers may misconfigure credentials, environment, or host setup: feat(patch): add patch_anchored tool — hash-anchored editing with atomic verify-apply
  • Recommended check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: feat(patch): add patch_anchored tool — hash-anchored editing with atomic verify-apply. Context: Source discussion did not expose a precise runtime context.
  • Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | https://github.com/gptme/gptme/issues/2667

7. Configuration risk: Configuration risk requires verification

  • Severity: medium
  • Finding: Developers should check this configuration risk before relying on the project: v0.31.1.dev20260504
  • User impact: Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v0.31.1.dev20260504
  • Recommended check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: v0.31.1.dev20260504. Context: Observed during installation or first-run setup.
  • Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_release | https://github.com/gptme/gptme/releases/tag/v0.31.1.dev20260504

8. Configuration risk: Configuration risk requires verification

  • Severity: medium
  • Finding: Developers should check this configuration risk before relying on the project: v0.31.1.dev20260511
  • User impact: Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v0.31.1.dev20260511
  • Recommended check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: v0.31.1.dev20260511. Context: Source discussion did not expose a precise runtime context.
  • Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_release | https://github.com/gptme/gptme/releases/tag/v0.31.1.dev20260511

9. Configuration risk: Configuration risk requires verification

  • Severity: medium
  • Finding: Developers should check this configuration risk before relying on the project: v0.31.1.dev20260518
  • User impact: Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v0.31.1.dev20260518
  • Recommended check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: v0.31.1.dev20260518. Context: Observed during installation or first-run setup.
  • Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_release | https://github.com/gptme/gptme/releases/tag/v0.31.1.dev20260518

10. Configuration risk: Configuration risk requires verification

  • Severity: medium
  • Finding: Developers should check this configuration risk before relying on the project: v0.31.1.dev20260521
  • User impact: Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v0.31.1.dev20260521
  • Recommended check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: v0.31.1.dev20260521. Context: Observed when using python, windows, macos
  • Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_release | https://github.com/gptme/gptme/releases/tag/v0.31.1.dev20260521

11. Configuration risk: Configuration risk requires verification

  • Severity: medium
  • Finding: Developers should check this configuration risk before relying on the project: v0.31.1.dev20260601
  • User impact: Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v0.31.1.dev20260601
  • Recommended check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: v0.31.1.dev20260601. Context: Observed when using python, docker
  • Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_release | https://github.com/gptme/gptme/releases/tag/v0.31.1.dev20260601

12. Capability evidence risk: Capability evidence risk requires verification

  • Severity: medium
  • Finding: README/documentation is current enough for a first validation pass.
  • User impact: May increase setup, validation, or first-run risk for the user.
  • Recommended check: Reproduce the official install and quickstart path in an isolated environment.
  • Evidence: capability.assumptions | https://github.com/gptme/gptme

Source: Doramagic discovery, validation, and Project Pack records

Community Discussion Evidence

These external discussion links are review inputs, not standalone proof that the project is production-ready.

Sources 12

Count of project-level external discussion links exposed on this manual page.

Use Review before install

Open the linked issues or discussions before treating the pack as ready for your environment.

Community Discussion Evidence

Doramagic exposes project-level community discussion separately from official documentation. Review these links before using gptme with real data or production workflows.

Source: Project Pack community evidence and pitfall evidence