# Pitfall Log

Project: guardrails-ai/guardrails

Summary: Found 38 potential pitfall items; 14 are high/blocking. Highest priority: installation - 来源证据：FIX action silently mutates output - should there be a 'quarantine' tier between LOG and FIX?.

## 1. installation · 来源证据：FIX action silently mutates output - should there be a 'quarantine' tier between LOG and FIX?

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安装相关的待验证问题：FIX action silently mutates output - should there be a 'quarantine' tier between LOG and FIX?
- User impact: 可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- Suggested check: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_69600563346341a386aa86c6af5d1274 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1448 | 来源类型 github_issue 暴露的待验证使用条件。

## 2. installation · 来源证据：Feature request: OWASP ASI06 memory poisoning guard validator

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安装相关的待验证问题：Feature request: OWASP ASI06 memory poisoning guard validator
- User impact: 可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- Suggested check: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_e44b7cdf7b674acf9789c9feddc13dbc | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1488 | 来源类型 github_issue 暴露的待验证使用条件。

## 3. installation · 来源证据：Portable evidence artifacts for validation outcomes

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安装相关的待验证问题：Portable evidence artifacts for validation outcomes
- User impact: 可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- Suggested check: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_ef2970465bbe44c89b513edd115b682c | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1457 | 来源讨论提到 python 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。

## 4. installation · 来源证据：Proposal: Agent Threat Rules detection integration

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安装相关的待验证问题：Proposal: Agent Threat Rules detection integration
- User impact: 可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- Suggested check: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_64ae6a0aa3324a3a9af980f2f61a5c30 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1471 | 来源讨论提到 python 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。

## 5. installation · 来源证据：Proposal: PromptDefenseAudit Hub validator — static system prompt hardening check

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安装相关的待验证问题：Proposal: PromptDefenseAudit Hub validator — static system prompt hardening check
- User impact: 可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- Suggested check: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_d7163e193eb54aab837d87b3ecd73991 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1453 | 来源讨论提到 python 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。

## 6. installation · 来源证据：[bug] 429 Rate Limit Error from Opting into Metrics

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安装相关的待验证问题：[bug] 429 Rate Limit Error from Opting into Metrics
- User impact: 可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- Suggested check: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_3c9ae4fdd14547eea3c3a4be6ac6fb23 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1385 | 来源类型 github_issue 暴露的待验证使用条件。

## 7. capability · 来源证据：[docs] Fix double logo display in pypi

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个能力理解相关的待验证问题：[docs] Fix double logo display in pypi
- User impact: 可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- Suggested check: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_084985c7cb4d4238a44e452b14b2eaf9 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1362 | 来源类型 github_issue 暴露的待验证使用条件。

## 8. security_permissions · 失败模式：security_permissions: Best-practice: litellm pin excludes patched CVE versions, unverified-jwt-decode duplication,...

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this security_permissions risk before relying on the project: Best-practice: litellm pin excludes patched CVE versions, unverified-jwt-decode duplication, workflow inputs interpolation
- User impact: Developers may expose sensitive permissions or credentials: Best-practice: litellm pin excludes patched CVE versions, unverified-jwt-decode duplication, workflow inputs interpolation
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Best-practice: litellm pin excludes patched CVE versions, unverified-jwt-decode duplication, workflow inputs interpolation. Context: Observed when using python
- Guardrail action: Do not recommend enabling privileged or credential-bearing paths until the source-backed risk is reviewed: https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1485
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_819ae3bfce09ed33a4655a81cf59dd44 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1485 | Best-practice: litellm pin excludes patched CVE versions, unverified-jwt-decode duplication, workflow inputs interpolation

## 9. security_permissions · 失败模式：security_permissions: Feature Request: OWASP ASI06 memory write validation via Agent Memory Guard

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this security_permissions risk before relying on the project: Feature Request: OWASP ASI06 memory write validation via Agent Memory Guard
- User impact: Developers may expose sensitive permissions or credentials: Feature Request: OWASP ASI06 memory write validation via Agent Memory Guard
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Feature Request: OWASP ASI06 memory write validation via Agent Memory Guard. Context: Observed when using python
- Guardrail action: Do not recommend enabling privileged or credential-bearing paths until the source-backed risk is reviewed: https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1476
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_2c7b3b6f6709cc847b37fb56bc9973d3 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1476 | Feature Request: OWASP ASI06 memory write validation via Agent Memory Guard, failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_77887b77c9dabcdbce93e8b20c9a7c57 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1475 | Feature Request: OWASP ASI06 memory write validation via Agent Memory Guard

## 10. security_permissions · 失败模式：security_permissions: [bug] Failures and Delayed Responses from guard.validate Method Using Different Validator wit...

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this security_permissions risk before relying on the project: [bug] Failures and Delayed Responses from guard.validate Method Using Different Validator with Guardrails Hub
- User impact: Developers may expose sensitive permissions or credentials: [bug] Failures and Delayed Responses from guard.validate Method Using Different Validator with Guardrails Hub
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: [bug] Failures and Delayed Responses from guard.validate Method Using Different Validator with Guardrails Hub. Context: Observed when using python, docker, cuda
- Guardrail action: Do not recommend enabling privileged or credential-bearing paths until the source-backed risk is reviewed: https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1479
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_70a43b34234fca351363180353991f27 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1479 | [bug] Failures and Delayed Responses from guard.validate Method Using Different Validator with Guardrails Hub

## 11. security_permissions · 来源证据：Feature Request: OWASP ASI06 memory write validation via Agent Memory Guard

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：Feature Request: OWASP ASI06 memory write validation via Agent Memory Guard
- User impact: 可能阻塞安装或首次运行。
- Suggested check: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_0f957598a5044976a69cdd1925dd9483 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1476 | 来源讨论提到 python 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。

## 12. security_permissions · 来源证据：Integration proposal: Cryptographic audit trail validator with asqav

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：Integration proposal: Cryptographic audit trail validator with asqav
- User impact: 可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- Suggested check: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_8db542ceccff4a71bc11c254ce3abfde | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1446 | 来源类型 github_issue 暴露的待验证使用条件。

## 13. security_permissions · 来源证据：Integration proposal: styxx hallucination validator (8-benchmark cross-validated)

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：Integration proposal: styxx hallucination validator (8-benchmark cross-validated)
- User impact: 可能影响授权、密钥配置或安全边界。
- Suggested check: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_da275c0a112848ed920af00c76fd3e1b | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1463 | 来源讨论提到 python 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。

## 14. security_permissions · 来源证据：[bug] Failures and Delayed Responses from guard.validate Method Using Different Validator with Guardrails Hub

- Severity: high
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：[bug] Failures and Delayed Responses from guard.validate Method Using Different Validator with Guardrails Hub
- User impact: 可能影响授权、密钥配置或安全边界。
- Suggested check: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_3f90fdd47b014d488f2782f04c75b37c | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1479 | 来源讨论提到 python 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。

## 15. installation · 失败模式：installation: Integration proposal: styxx hallucination validator (8-benchmark cross-validated)

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: Integration proposal: styxx hallucination validator (8-benchmark cross-validated)
- User impact: Developers may fail before the first successful local run: Integration proposal: styxx hallucination validator (8-benchmark cross-validated)
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Integration proposal: styxx hallucination validator (8-benchmark cross-validated). Context: Observed when using python, cuda
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_2a7dfe1829e559543fd3177ac3a0ace3 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1463 | Integration proposal: styxx hallucination validator (8-benchmark cross-validated)

## 16. installation · 失败模式：installation: Lift litellm <1.82.6 pin to allow post-incident safe releases (1.83+)

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: Lift litellm <1.82.6 pin to allow post-incident safe releases (1.83+)
- User impact: Developers may fail before the first successful local run: Lift litellm <1.82.6 pin to allow post-incident safe releases (1.83+)
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Lift litellm <1.82.6 pin to allow post-incident safe releases (1.83+). Context: Observed during installation or first-run setup.
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_b8ff8a254ff16e4d23faa27660558c49 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1483 | Lift litellm <1.82.6 pin to allow post-incident safe releases (1.83+)

## 17. installation · 失败模式：installation: Proposal: Agent Threat Rules detection integration

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: Proposal: Agent Threat Rules detection integration
- User impact: Developers may fail before the first successful local run: Proposal: Agent Threat Rules detection integration
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Proposal: Agent Threat Rules detection integration. Context: Observed during installation or first-run setup.
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_6bc24f2942ba0fbe13c0d348506bf619 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1471 | Proposal: Agent Threat Rules detection integration

## 18. installation · 失败模式：installation: [bug] 429 Rate Limit Error from Opting into Metrics

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: [bug] 429 Rate Limit Error from Opting into Metrics
- User impact: Developers may fail before the first successful local run: [bug] 429 Rate Limit Error from Opting into Metrics
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: [bug] 429 Rate Limit Error from Opting into Metrics. Context: Observed during installation or first-run setup.
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_c0442e907dbee8c67e3e11968abd509a | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1385 | [bug] 429 Rate Limit Error from Opting into Metrics

## 19. installation · 失败模式：installation: [bug] Command 'guardrails hub install hub://arize-ai/llm_rag_evaluator' fails with 500 and 'N...

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: [bug] Command 'guardrails hub install hub://arize-ai/llm_rag_evaluator' fails with 500 and 'No matching distribution found'
- User impact: Developers may fail before the first successful local run: [bug] Command 'guardrails hub install hub://arize-ai/llm_rag_evaluator' fails with 500 and 'No matching distribution found'
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: [bug] Command 'guardrails hub install hub://arize-ai/llm_rag_evaluator' fails with 500 and 'No matching distribution found'. Context: Observed when using python, docker
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_4e9aa8a1b02d1ede79b30b62ddb6ceba | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1477 | [bug] Command 'guardrails hub install hub://arize-ai/llm_rag_evaluator' fails with 500 and 'No matching distribution found'

## 20. installation · 失败模式：installation: [bug] Guardrails CLI start command broken with guardrails-api 0.4.2

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: [bug] Guardrails CLI start command broken with guardrails-api 0.4.2
- User impact: Developers may fail before the first successful local run: [bug] Guardrails CLI start command broken with guardrails-api 0.4.2
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: [bug] Guardrails CLI start command broken with guardrails-api 0.4.2. Context: Observed when using python, macos
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_3d41c127084ca13dab398cfd91d3a12e | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1464 | [bug] Guardrails CLI start command broken with guardrails-api 0.4.2

## 21. installation · 失败模式：installation: v0.9.2

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: v0.9.2
- User impact: Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v0.9.2
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: v0.9.2. Context: Observed when using node, python
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_release | fmev_c54b42261d198f5d86e2d86b973022b2 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/releases/tag/v0.9.2 | v0.9.2

## 22. installation · 失败模式：installation: v0.9.3

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: v0.9.3
- User impact: Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v0.9.3
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: v0.9.3. Context: Observed when using python
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_release | fmev_ccf3f3888877fa148fd2b9e4d1685a07 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/releases/tag/v0.9.3 | v0.9.3

## 23. configuration · 失败模式：configuration: Integration proposal: Cryptographic audit trail validator with asqav

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this configuration risk before relying on the project: Integration proposal: Cryptographic audit trail validator with asqav
- User impact: Developers may misconfigure credentials, environment, or host setup: Integration proposal: Cryptographic audit trail validator with asqav
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Integration proposal: Cryptographic audit trail validator with asqav. Context: Observed when using python
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_3e83bc4e63af89b800f024f286804a55 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1446 | Integration proposal: Cryptographic audit trail validator with asqav

## 24. configuration · 失败模式：configuration: MCP Server Compliance Scanning: OWASP MCP Top 10 guardrails

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this configuration risk before relying on the project: MCP Server Compliance Scanning: OWASP MCP Top 10 guardrails
- User impact: Developers may misconfigure credentials, environment, or host setup: MCP Server Compliance Scanning: OWASP MCP Top 10 guardrails
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: MCP Server Compliance Scanning: OWASP MCP Top 10 guardrails. Context: Observed when using node, python, docker
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_505b8100ee11945f0044da14ce3d5045 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1435 | MCP Server Compliance Scanning: OWASP MCP Top 10 guardrails

## 25. configuration · 失败模式：configuration: Proposal: PromptDefenseAudit Hub validator — static system prompt hardening check

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this configuration risk before relying on the project: Proposal: PromptDefenseAudit Hub validator — static system prompt hardening check
- User impact: Developers may misconfigure credentials, environment, or host setup: Proposal: PromptDefenseAudit Hub validator — static system prompt hardening check
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Proposal: PromptDefenseAudit Hub validator — static system prompt hardening check. Context: Observed when using python
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_7ce2d4758da469cfafebf0b41e8f8f3f | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1453 | Proposal: PromptDefenseAudit Hub validator — static system prompt hardening check

## 26. configuration · 来源证据：[feat] Attempt to repair JSON before triggering NonParseableReAsk

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个配置相关的待验证问题：[feat] Attempt to repair JSON before triggering NonParseableReAsk
- User impact: 可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- Suggested check: 来源显示可能已有修复、规避或版本变化，说明书中必须标注适用版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_0e5b292fafab4cdfb39c7541516cecb7 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1380 | 来源讨论提到 python 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。

## 27. capability · 能力判断依赖假设

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: README/documentation is current enough for a first validation pass.
- User impact: 假设不成立时，用户拿不到承诺的能力。
- Suggested check: 将假设转成下游验证清单。
- Guardrail action: 假设必须转成验证项；没有验证结果前不能写成事实。
- Evidence: capability.assumptions | github_repo:594609262 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails | README/documentation is current enough for a first validation pass.

## 28. runtime · 失败模式：runtime: Portable evidence artifacts for validation outcomes

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this runtime risk before relying on the project: Portable evidence artifacts for validation outcomes
- User impact: Developers may hit a documented source-backed failure mode: Portable evidence artifacts for validation outcomes
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Portable evidence artifacts for validation outcomes. Context: Observed when using python
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_2379f90244868de9553a10aa0783be57 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1457 | Portable evidence artifacts for validation outcomes

## 29. runtime · 失败模式：runtime: on_fail="refrain" behavior unclear/inconsistent with documentation

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: Developers should check this runtime risk before relying on the project: on_fail="refrain" behavior unclear/inconsistent with documentation
- User impact: Developers may hit a documented source-backed failure mode: on_fail="refrain" behavior unclear/inconsistent with documentation
- Suggested check: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: on_fail="refrain" behavior unclear/inconsistent with documentation. Context: Observed when using python
- Guardrail action: State this as source-backed community evidence, not as Doramagic reproduction.
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_6963ac9f9e50fbdabe6896ca38295267 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1395 | on_fail="refrain" behavior unclear/inconsistent with documentation

## 30. maintenance · 维护活跃度未知

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: 未记录 last_activity_observed。
- User impact: 新项目、停更项目和活跃项目会被混在一起，推荐信任度下降。
- Suggested check: 补 GitHub 最近 commit、release、issue/PR 响应信号。
- Guardrail action: 维护活跃度未知时，推荐强度不能标为高信任。
- Evidence: evidence.maintainer_signals | github_repo:594609262 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails | last_activity_observed missing

## 31. security_permissions · 下游验证发现风险项

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: no_demo
- User impact: 下游已经要求复核，不能在页面中弱化。
- Suggested check: 进入安全/权限治理复核队列。
- Guardrail action: 下游风险存在时必须保持 review/recommendation 降级。
- Evidence: downstream_validation.risk_items | github_repo:594609262 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails | no_demo; severity=medium

## 32. security_permissions · 存在评分风险

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: no_demo
- User impact: 风险会影响是否适合普通用户安装。
- Suggested check: 把风险写入边界卡，并确认是否需要人工复核。
- Guardrail action: 评分风险必须进入边界卡，不能只作为内部分数。
- Evidence: risks.scoring_risks | github_repo:594609262 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails | no_demo; severity=medium

## 33. security_permissions · 来源证据：Best-practice: litellm pin excludes patched CVE versions, unverified-jwt-decode duplication, workflow inputs interpolat…

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：Best-practice: litellm pin excludes patched CVE versions, unverified-jwt-decode duplication, workflow inputs interpolation
- User impact: 可能影响授权、密钥配置或安全边界。
- Suggested check: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_222c3a7398b845d58afc8e03e3cd2d56 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1485 | 来源讨论提到 python 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。

## 34. security_permissions · 来源证据：MCP Server Compliance Scanning: OWASP MCP Top 10 guardrails

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：MCP Server Compliance Scanning: OWASP MCP Top 10 guardrails
- User impact: 可能影响授权、密钥配置或安全边界。
- Suggested check: 来源显示可能已有修复、规避或版本变化，说明书中必须标注适用版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_b6a63df899144908af33089886cfaf51 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1435 | 来源讨论提到 python 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。

## 35. security_permissions · 来源证据：[bug] Command 'guardrails hub install hub://arize-ai/llm_rag_evaluator' fails with 500 and 'No matching distribution fo…

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：[bug] Command 'guardrails hub install hub://arize-ai/llm_rag_evaluator' fails with 500 and 'No matching distribution found'
- User impact: 可能影响授权、密钥配置或安全边界。
- Suggested check: 来源显示可能已有修复、规避或版本变化，说明书中必须标注适用版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_f801c42622884292b29b3ae18f365af6 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1477 | 来源类型 github_issue 暴露的待验证使用条件。

## 36. security_permissions · 来源证据：on_fail="refrain" behavior unclear/inconsistent with documentation

- Severity: medium
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：on_fail="refrain" behavior unclear/inconsistent with documentation
- User impact: 可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- Suggested check: 来源显示可能已有修复、规避或版本变化，说明书中必须标注适用版本。
- Guardrail action: 不得脱离来源链接放大为确定性结论；需要标注适用版本和复核状态。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_8881807252f149aeb7bc2c3a46019ce0 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails/issues/1395 | 来源讨论提到 python 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。

## 37. maintenance · issue/PR 响应质量未知

- Severity: low
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: issue_or_pr_quality=unknown。
- User impact: 用户无法判断遇到问题后是否有人维护。
- Suggested check: 抽样最近 issue/PR，判断是否长期无人处理。
- Guardrail action: issue/PR 响应未知时，必须提示维护风险。
- Evidence: evidence.maintainer_signals | github_repo:594609262 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails | issue_or_pr_quality=unknown

## 38. maintenance · 发布节奏不明确

- Severity: low
- Evidence strength: source_linked
- Finding: release_recency=unknown。
- User impact: 安装命令和文档可能落后于代码，用户踩坑概率升高。
- Suggested check: 确认最近 release/tag 和 README 安装命令是否一致。
- Guardrail action: 发布节奏未知或过期时，安装说明必须标注可能漂移。
- Evidence: evidence.maintainer_signals | github_repo:594609262 | https://github.com/guardrails-ai/guardrails | release_recency=unknown