Does my pet act as a familiar for me?

I can't name what your pet *is* for you — the cards don't certify a bond as a category — but the three I just drew say something narrower and checkable: the bond looks like it does work on you, whether or not it earns that name.

Past — Judgement (upright): something got called and answered before the pet came in. This seat is a reckoning that already happened — you made a turn you didn't expect to make, and you don't usually go back and re-open that decision. The pet arrived into the space that had been cleared.

Present — The Fool (upright): right now this is live, unframed, beginner-shaped. Not a ritual, not a system — a daily thing that keeps being new. The Fool in this seat says the arrangement isn't built on a fixed role you assigned; it's improvised, and that improvisation is the actual content.

Future — The Star (upright): *if* you keep living it the way you are now, it tends toward restoration rather than strain — the quiet, unspectacular kind of hope, where the pet is the reason a day feels inhabitable. That's a tendency under that condition, not a forecast.

All three are Major Arcana: whatever this is, it sits in the structural layer of your life, not in the scheduling layer — which is why asking whether it deserves a name keeps not landing.

Here's the one check, and it's yours to run alone inside 48 hours: for the next seven days, write down the time and situation each time the pet's need actually changed or blocked something you had already planned — vet visit, work block, a trip you dropped. Nothing about how you felt, just the seven lines. On the seventh day read them back as a list.

If those seven lines turn out to be scattered and rare, this is company rather than a familiar, and the Star seat is about comfort, not working weight. If they cluster into one or two daily hours that you'd defend to anyone, the Judgement–Fool–Star line is telling the truth and the name was just late.

Want me to save this spread to your journal?