My 8th grader came home from school comp
Ask
My 8th grader came home from school completely furious about a math quiz. The problem was:
Evaluate: -3^2
He wrote 9. The teacher marked it incorrect with red ink and wrote -9.
My son is arguing passionately: "My teacher is completely wrong! We learned that a negative number times a negative number is always positive. -3 times -3 is 9! If I type -3 * -3 into Google it says 9!"
When he typed -3^2 into his scientific calculator, it output -9. Now he's convinced the calculator has a software bug or PEMDAS doesn't make sense.
I don't want to just spoon-feed him the rule or tell him "because the teacher said so." I want to be the tutor at home tonight and guide him Socratically to see the mathematical structure himself:
1. **Misconception Name**: What is the precise mathematical misconception here (order of operations: exponents have higher precedence than the unary negative sign / multiplication by -1)?
2. **Diagnostic Questions for the Parent**: What 1–2 speakable Socratic questions should I ask him across the table, and how will I know each question has landed? (e.g. asking him to write out what the exponent 2 is actually attached to in -3^2 versus (-3)^2, or rewriting -3^2 as -1 * 3^2)?
3. **One Changed-Number Parallel Item**: A parallel practice problem with different numbers (without giving away the final numeric answer) for him to test his understanding independently?
4. **One Follow-up Clarification Question**: What one question about his class curriculum or teacher's notation would sharpen the next step?
Answer
I'll peek at the algebra misconception card and the Socratic reference so my questions match the framework the skill expects.
**Misconception Name**
He's reading `-3^2` as `(-3) × (-3)`. The rule "negative × negative = positive" fires when **two separate** negatives are being multiplied. In `-3^2`, the exponent `2` is only on the `3` — the minus sign is a *separate* unary operator ("take the opposite"), applied **after** the squaring. Plain words for the kitchen table: *"The 2 is riding only the 3, not the minus. The minus is a 'flip the sign' step that happens last."*
**Two Diagnostic Questions**
Q1. *"In `-3^2`, put your finger on the `2`. What is it sitting on top of — just the `3`, or the `3` and the minus together?"*
- **How you'll know it landed (parent's self-check):** Does his finger stay on the `3`, with the minus clearly to the left and outside? If he sweeps across both, follow up: *"Then how would you write it if the minus were inside the exponent?"* — he should arrive at `(-3)^2` with the parentheses, not at a new number.
Q2. *"The rule 'a negative times a negative is positive' — how many numbers are being multiplied when that rule fires? Now look at `-3^2`: how many separate numbers are actually being multiplied here? Walk me through what's happening."*
- **How you'll know it landed (parent's self-check):** Does he name that the rule needs two factors, and that here there's only one — the `3` getting squared — with the minus acting as a unary flip on the result? If he insists "but there's a minus in front *and* the squaring is doing something negative," the rule he learned doesn't fit this structure. That's the gap, not a personality conflict.
**Changed-Number Parallel Item**
Compute `-5^2`. **Before you touch numbers**, write two lines on paper:
1. What the exponent `2` is attached to.
2. What the minus sign is doing.
Then compute step by step.
- **How you'll check without giving the answer:** Look at his two written lines first, *then* look at the number. If line 1 says "the 2 is only on the 5" and his final answer is negative, the structure carried into the computation — it landed. If line 1 says "only on the 5" but his answer came out positive, the structure understanding didn't carry; that's the next move. If line 1 says "the 2 is on the 5 *and* the minus," the first question didn't land — go back to Q1 with `-5^2` before going further.
**Follow-up Clarification Question**
*"Has your math class this year formally distinguished the minus **between** two numbers — like `5 − 3` — from the minus **in front of** a single number — like `−3`? Some 8th-grade books delay that vocabulary until Algebra 1."*
Knowing the answer tells you whether tonight's job is *"help him see the structure now"* (if the class hasn't separated the two minuses yet) or *"preview the notation so the teacher's `-9` stops feeling arbitrary"* (if they have). It also tells you whether to expect more `-3^2`-style items on the next quiz.
One small note for the angry-son moment, separate from the math: the Google result he got (`9`) is almost certainly Google's calculator treating `-3 * -3` as typed, not the literal expression `-3^2`. If he types `-3^2` into Google now (with the caret), he should get `-9`. That doesn't change the math — but it takes "the calculator is broken" off the table so the conversation can stay on structure.