In short, I got The Devil (first card) a

I'll pull up the script and run it on your two cards. Since you didn't say upright/reversed, I'll have the script assign orientations for the cards you held. Let me check the CLI reference and the language card for the read.

Let me run the script for both cards (I'll default to upright since you didn't specify orientation).

The script doesn't recognize "III of Swords" — let me check the deck file for the right English name.

Both cards came back verified (seed_source: provided).

---

The pull is naming the chain, not the door. The Devil in seat one (advice) points to an attachment doing the steering — comfort, status, a salary floor, a familiar pain you've mistaken for safety. Three of Swords as the clarifier doesn't soften it: that attachment is hurting you, actively.

The job question isn't really "which offer" — it's "what am I holding onto that I haven't yet admitted costs me something."

Sit with it for ten minutes and write down what you'd actually lose if you left today — by name, by number, by what you'd miss. Whatever you can name cleanly is a real attachment; whatever you can't name is the unnamed pain Three of Swords is pointing at.

*(You wrote them as "III of Swords" — script took "Three of Swords." And I read both upright since you didn't flag either as reversed; if one was reversed, the read tilts and I'll redo it.)*