# superpowers - Doramagic AI Context Pack

> 定位：安装前体验与判断资产。它帮助宿主 AI 有一个好的开始，但不代表已经安装、执行或验证目标项目。

## 充分原则

- **充分原则，不是压缩原则**：AI Context Pack 应该充分到让宿主 AI 在开工前理解项目价值、能力边界、使用入口、风险和证据来源；它可以分层组织，但不以最短摘要为目标。
- **压缩策略**：只压缩噪声和重复内容，不压缩会影响判断和开工质量的上下文。

## 给宿主 AI 的使用方式

你正在读取 Doramagic 为 superpowers 编译的 AI Context Pack。请把它当作开工前上下文：帮助用户理解适合谁、能做什么、如何开始、哪些必须安装后验证、风险在哪里。不要声称你已经安装、运行或执行了目标项目。

## Claim 消费规则

- **事实来源**：Repo Evidence + Claim/Evidence Graph；Human Wiki 只提供显著性、术语和叙事结构。
- **事实最低状态**：`supported`
- `supported`：可以作为项目事实使用，但回答中必须引用 claim_id 和证据路径。
- `weak`：只能作为低置信度线索，必须要求用户继续核实。
- `inferred`：只能用于风险提示或待确认问题，不能包装成项目事实。
- `unverified`：不得作为事实使用，应明确说证据不足。
- `contradicted`：必须展示冲突来源，不得替用户强行选择一个版本。

## 它最适合谁

- **正在使用 Claude/Codex/Cursor/Gemini 等宿主 AI 的开发者**：README 或插件配置提到多个宿主 AI。 证据：`README.md` Claim：`clm_0004` supported 0.86
- **希望把专业流程带进宿主 AI 的用户**：仓库包含 Skill 文档。 证据：`skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md`, `skills/dispatching-parallel-agents/SKILL.md`, `skills/executing-plans/SKILL.md`, `skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md` 等 Claim：`clm_0005` supported 0.86

## 它能做什么

- **AI Skill / Agent 指令资产库**（可做安装前预览）：项目包含可被宿主 AI 读取的 Skill 或 Agent 指令文件，可用于把专业流程带入 Claude、Codex、Cursor 等宿主。 证据：`skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md`, `skills/dispatching-parallel-agents/SKILL.md`, `skills/executing-plans/SKILL.md`, `skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md` 等 Claim：`clm_0001` supported 0.86
- **多宿主安装与分发**（需要安装后验证）：项目包含插件或 marketplace 配置，说明它面向一个或多个 AI 宿主的安装和分发。 证据：`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` Claim：`clm_0002` supported 0.86
- **命令行启动或安装流程**（需要安装后验证）：项目文档中存在可执行命令，真实使用需要在本地或宿主环境中运行这些命令。 证据：`.opencode/INSTALL.md`, `README.md` Claim：`clm_0003` supported 0.86

## 怎么开始

- `/plugin install superpowers@claude-plugins-official` 证据：`README.md` Claim：`clm_0006` supported 0.86
- `/plugin marketplace add obra/superpowers-marketplace` 证据：`README.md` Claim：`clm_0007` supported 0.86
- `/plugin install superpowers@superpowers-marketplace` 证据：`README.md` Claim：`clm_0008` supported 0.86
- `npm install superpowers@git+https://github.com/obra/superpowers.git --prefix "$HOME\.config\opencode"` 证据：`.opencode/INSTALL.md` Claim：`clm_0009` supported 0.86

## 继续前判断卡

- **当前建议**：先做流程沙盒试用
- **为什么**：这个项目会改变宿主 AI 的开发流程和规则，值得继续试，但不要直接装进主力 Claude/Cursor/Codex；先用临时宿主或隔离目录验证。

### 30 秒判断

- **现在怎么做**：先做流程沙盒试用
- **最小安全下一步**：先用 Prompt Preview 感受流程约束；满意后再临时宿主试装
- **先别相信**：这套流程是否适合你的工作方式不能直接相信。
- **继续会触碰**：宿主行为改变、命令执行、宿主 AI 配置

### 现在可以相信

- **适合人群线索：正在使用 Claude/Codex/Cursor/Gemini 等宿主 AI 的开发者**（supported）：有 supported claim 或项目证据支撑，但仍不等于真实安装效果。 证据：`README.md` Claim：`clm_0004` supported 0.86
- **适合人群线索：希望把专业流程带进宿主 AI 的用户**（supported）：有 supported claim 或项目证据支撑，但仍不等于真实安装效果。 证据：`skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md`, `skills/dispatching-parallel-agents/SKILL.md`, `skills/executing-plans/SKILL.md`, `skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md` 等 Claim：`clm_0005` supported 0.86
- **能力存在：AI Skill / Agent 指令资产库**（supported）：可以相信项目包含这类能力线索；是否适合你的具体任务仍要试用或安装后验证。 证据：`skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md`, `skills/dispatching-parallel-agents/SKILL.md`, `skills/executing-plans/SKILL.md`, `skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md` 等 Claim：`clm_0001` supported 0.86
- **能力存在：多宿主安装与分发**（supported）：可以相信项目包含这类能力线索；是否适合你的具体任务仍要试用或安装后验证。 证据：`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` Claim：`clm_0002` supported 0.86
- **能力存在：命令行启动或安装流程**（supported）：可以相信项目包含这类能力线索；是否适合你的具体任务仍要试用或安装后验证。 证据：`.opencode/INSTALL.md`, `README.md` Claim：`clm_0003` supported 0.86
- **存在 Quick Start / 安装命令线索**（supported）：可以相信项目文档出现过启动或安装入口；不要因此直接在主力环境运行。 证据：`README.md` Claim：`clm_0006` supported 0.86

### 现在还不能相信

- **这套流程是否适合你的工作方式不能直接相信。**（unverified）：流程型 Skill 可能强约束 AI 行为；它能提升纪律，也可能拖慢你当前任务节奏。 证据：`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` 等
- **不会和你已有 Claude/Cursor/Codex 规则冲突，不能直接相信。**（inferred）：开发流程 Skill 会改变澄清、计划、测试、验证等默认行为，必须在临时宿主里试。 证据：`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` 等
- **真实输出质量不能在安装前相信。**（unverified）：Prompt Preview 只能展示引导方式，不能证明真实项目中的结果质量。
- **宿主 AI 版本兼容性不能在安装前相信。**（unverified）：Claude、Cursor、Codex、Gemini 等宿主加载规则和版本差异必须在真实环境验证。
- **不会污染现有宿主 AI 行为，不能直接相信。**（inferred）：Skill、plugin、AGENTS/CLAUDE/GEMINI 指令可能改变宿主 AI 的默认行为。 证据：`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` 等
- **可安全回滚不能默认相信。**（unverified）：除非项目明确提供卸载和恢复说明，否则必须先在隔离环境验证。
- **真实安装后是否与用户当前宿主 AI 版本兼容？**（unverified）：兼容性只能通过实际宿主环境验证。 证据：`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json`
- **项目输出质量是否满足用户具体任务？**（unverified）：安装前预览只能展示流程和边界，不能替代真实评测。

### 继续会触碰什么

- **宿主行为改变**：澄清、计划、TDD、验证、收尾等默认开发节奏。 原因：这类 Skill 的价值和风险都来自强约束流程；必须先确认你愿意被它改变工作方式。 证据：`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` 等
- **命令执行**：包管理器、网络下载、本地插件目录、项目配置或用户主目录。 原因：运行第一条命令就可能产生环境改动；必须先判断是否值得跑。 证据：`.opencode/INSTALL.md`, `README.md`
- **宿主 AI 配置**：Claude/Codex/Cursor/Gemini/OpenCode 等宿主的 plugin、Skill 或规则加载配置。 原因：宿主配置会改变 AI 后续工作方式，可能和用户已有规则冲突。 证据：`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` 等
- **本地环境或项目文件**：安装结果、插件缓存、项目配置或本地依赖目录。 原因：安装前无法证明写入范围和回滚方式，需要隔离验证。 证据：`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` 等
- **宿主 AI 上下文**：AI Context Pack、Prompt Preview、Skill 路由、风险规则和项目事实。 原因：导入上下文会影响宿主 AI 后续判断，必须避免把未验证项包装成事实。

### 最小安全下一步

- **先跑 Prompt Preview**：先感受它会怎样改变 AI 的开发节奏，再决定是否让它进入真实宿主。（适用：任何项目都适用，尤其是输出质量未知时。）
- **只在隔离目录或测试账号试装**：避免安装命令污染主力宿主 AI、真实项目或用户主目录。（适用：存在命令执行、插件配置或本地写入线索时。）
- **先备份宿主 AI 配置**：Skill、plugin、规则文件可能改变 Claude/Cursor/Codex 的默认行为。（适用：存在插件 manifest、Skill 或宿主规则入口时。）
- **安装后只验证一个最小任务**：先验证加载、兼容、输出质量和回滚，再决定是否深用。（适用：准备从试用进入真实工作流时。）

### 退出方式

- **保留安装前状态**：记录原始宿主配置和项目状态，后续才能判断是否可恢复。
- **准备移除宿主 plugin / Skill / 规则入口**：如果试装后行为异常，可以把宿主 AI 恢复到试装前状态。
- **记录安装命令和写入路径**：没有明确卸载说明时，至少要知道哪些目录或配置需要手动清理。
- **如果没有回滚路径，不进入主力环境**：不可回滚是继续前阻断项，不应靠信任或运气继续。

## 哪些只能预览

- 解释项目适合谁和能做什么
- 基于项目文档演示典型对话流程
- 帮助用户判断是否值得安装或继续研究

## 哪些必须安装后验证

- 真实安装 Skill、插件或 CLI
- 执行脚本、修改本地文件或访问外部服务
- 验证真实输出质量、性能和兼容性

## 边界与风险判断卡

- **把安装前预览误认为真实运行**：用户可能高估项目已经完成的配置、权限和兼容性验证。 处理方式：明确区分 prompt_preview_can_do 与 runtime_required。 Claim：`clm_0010` inferred 0.45
- **宿主 AI 插件或 Skill 规则冲突**：新规则可能改变用户现有宿主 AI 的工作方式。 处理方式：安装前先检查插件 manifest 和 Skill 文件，必要时隔离测试。 证据：`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` Claim：`clm_0011` supported 0.86
- **命令执行会修改本地环境**：安装命令可能写入用户主目录、宿主插件目录或项目配置。 处理方式：先在隔离环境或测试账号中运行。 证据：`.opencode/INSTALL.md`, `README.md` Claim：`clm_0012` supported 0.86
- **待确认**：真实安装后是否与用户当前宿主 AI 版本兼容？。原因：兼容性只能通过实际宿主环境验证。
- **待确认**：项目输出质量是否满足用户具体任务？。原因：安装前预览只能展示流程和边界，不能替代真实评测。
- **待确认**：安装命令是否需要网络、权限或全局写入？。原因：这影响企业环境和个人环境的安装风险。

## 开工前工作上下文

### 加载顺序

- 先读取 how_to_use.host_ai_instruction，建立安装前判断资产的边界。
- 读取 claim_graph_summary，确认事实来自 Claim/Evidence Graph，而不是 Human Wiki 叙事。
- 再读取 intended_users、capabilities 和 quick_start_candidates，判断用户是否匹配。
- 需要执行具体任务时，优先查 role_skill_index，再查 evidence_index。
- 遇到真实安装、文件修改、网络访问、性能或兼容性问题时，转入 risk_card 和 boundaries.runtime_required。

### 任务路由

- **AI Skill / Agent 指令资产库**：先基于 role_skill_index / evidence_index 帮用户挑选可用角色、Skill 或工作流。 边界：可做安装前 Prompt 体验。 证据：`skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md`, `skills/dispatching-parallel-agents/SKILL.md`, `skills/executing-plans/SKILL.md`, `skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md` 等 Claim：`clm_0001` supported 0.86
- **多宿主安装与分发**：先说明这是安装后验证能力，再给出安装前检查清单。 边界：必须真实安装或运行后验证。 证据：`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`, `.claude-plugin/plugin.json`, `.codex-plugin/plugin.json`, `.cursor-plugin/plugin.json` Claim：`clm_0002` supported 0.86
- **命令行启动或安装流程**：先说明这是安装后验证能力，再给出安装前检查清单。 边界：必须真实安装或运行后验证。 证据：`.opencode/INSTALL.md`, `README.md` Claim：`clm_0003` supported 0.86

### 上下文规模

- 文件总数：86
- 重要文件覆盖：40/86
- 证据索引条目：79
- 角色 / Skill 条目：14

### 证据不足时的处理

- **missing_evidence**：说明证据不足，要求用户提供目标文件、README 段落或安装后验证记录；不要补全事实。
- **out_of_scope_request**：说明该任务超出当前 AI Context Pack 证据范围，并建议用户先查看 Human Manual 或真实安装后验证。
- **runtime_request**：给出安装前检查清单和命令来源，但不要替用户执行命令或声称已执行。
- **source_conflict**：同时展示冲突来源，标记为待核实，不要强行选择一个版本。

## Prompt Recipes

### 适配判断

- 目标：判断这个项目是否适合用户当前任务。
- 预期输出：适配结论、关键理由、证据引用、安装前可预览内容、必须安装后验证内容、下一步建议。

```text
请基于 superpowers 的 AI Context Pack，先问我 3 个必要问题，然后判断它是否适合我的任务。回答必须包含：适合谁、能做什么、不能做什么、是否值得安装、证据来自哪里。所有项目事实必须引用 evidence_refs、source_paths 或 claim_id。
```

### 安装前体验

- 目标：让用户在安装前感受核心工作流，同时避免把预览包装成真实能力或营销承诺。
- 预期输出：一段带边界标签的体验剧本、安装后验证清单和谨慎建议；不含真实运行承诺或强营销表述。

```text
请把 superpowers 当作安装前体验资产，而不是已安装工具或真实运行环境。

请严格输出四段：
1. 先问我 3 个必要问题。
2. 给出一段“体验剧本”：用 [安装前可预览]、[必须安装后验证]、[证据不足] 三种标签展示它可能如何引导工作流。
3. 给出安装后验证清单：列出哪些能力只有真实安装、真实宿主加载、真实项目运行后才能确认。
4. 给出谨慎建议：只能说“值得继续研究/试装”“先补充信息后再判断”或“不建议继续”，不得替项目背书。

硬性边界：
- 不要声称已经安装、运行、执行测试、修改文件或产生真实结果。
- 不要写“自动适配”“确保通过”“完美适配”“强烈建议安装”等承诺性表达。
- 如果描述安装后的工作方式，必须使用“如果安装成功且宿主正确加载 Skill，它可能会……”这种条件句。
- 体验剧本只能写成“示例台词/假设流程”：使用“可能会询问/可能会建议/可能会展示”，不要写“已写入、已生成、已通过、正在运行、正在生成”。
- Prompt Preview 不负责给安装命令；如用户准备试装，只能提示先阅读 Quick Start 和 Risk Card，并在隔离环境验证。
- 所有项目事实必须来自 supported claim、evidence_refs 或 source_paths；inferred/unverified 只能作风险或待确认项。

```

### 角色 / Skill 选择

- 目标：从项目里的角色或 Skill 中挑选最匹配的资产。
- 预期输出：候选角色或 Skill 列表，每项包含适用场景、证据路径、风险边界和是否需要安装后验证。

```text
请读取 role_skill_index，根据我的目标任务推荐 3-5 个最相关的角色或 Skill。每个推荐都要说明适用场景、可能输出、风险边界和 evidence_refs。
```

### 风险预检

- 目标：安装或引入前识别环境、权限、规则冲突和质量风险。
- 预期输出：环境、权限、依赖、许可、宿主冲突、质量风险和未知项的检查清单。

```text
请基于 risk_card、boundaries 和 quick_start_candidates，给我一份安装前风险预检清单。不要替我执行命令，只说明我应该检查什么、为什么检查、失败会有什么影响。
```

### 宿主 AI 开工指令

- 目标：把项目上下文转成一次对话开始前的宿主 AI 指令。
- 预期输出：一段边界明确、证据引用明确、适合复制给宿主 AI 的开工前指令。

```text
请基于 superpowers 的 AI Context Pack，生成一段我可以粘贴给宿主 AI 的开工前指令。这段指令必须遵守 not_runtime=true，不能声称项目已经安装、运行或产生真实结果。
```


## 角色 / Skill 索引

- 共索引 14 个角色 / Skill / 项目文档条目。

- **brainstorming**（skill）：You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation. 激活提示：当用户任务与“brainstorming”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md`
- **dispatching-parallel-agents**（skill）：Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies 激活提示：当用户任务与“dispatching-parallel-agents”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/dispatching-parallel-agents/SKILL.md`
- **executing-plans**（skill）：Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints 激活提示：当用户任务与“executing-plans”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/executing-plans/SKILL.md`
- **finishing-a-development-branch**（skill）：Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup 激活提示：当用户任务与“finishing-a-development-branch”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md`
- **receiving-code-review**（skill）：Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation 激活提示：当用户任务与“receiving-code-review”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md`
- **requesting-code-review**（skill）：Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements 激活提示：当用户任务与“requesting-code-review”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md`
- **subagent-driven-development**（skill）：Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session 激活提示：当用户任务与“subagent-driven-development”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md`
- **systematic-debugging**（skill）：Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes 激活提示：当用户任务与“systematic-debugging”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md`
- **test-driven-development**（skill）：Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code 激活提示：当用户任务与“test-driven-development”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md`
- **using-git-worktrees**（skill）：Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback 激活提示：当用户任务与“using-git-worktrees”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md`
- **using-superpowers**（skill）：Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions 激活提示：当用户任务与“using-superpowers”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md`
- **verification-before-completion**（skill）：Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always 激活提示：当用户任务与“verification-before-completion”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.md`
- **writing-plans**（skill）：Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code 激活提示：当用户任务与“writing-plans”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/writing-plans/SKILL.md`
- **writing-skills**（skill）：Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment 激活提示：当用户任务与“writing-skills”描述的流程高度相关时，先用它做安装前体验，再决定是否安装。 证据：`skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md`

## 证据索引

- 共索引 79 条证据。

- **Superpowers — Contributor Guidelines**（documentation）：Superpowers — Contributor Guidelines 证据：`CLAUDE.md`
- **Gemini**（documentation）：@./skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md @./skills/using-superpowers/references/gemini-tools.md 证据：`GEMINI.md`
- **Superpowers**（documentation）：Superpowers is a complete software development methodology for your coding agents, built on top of a set of composable skills and some initial instructions that make sure your agent uses them. 证据：`README.md`
- **Package**（package_manifest）：{ "name": "superpowers", "version": "5.1.0", "type": "module", "main": ".opencode/plugins/superpowers.js" } 证据：`package.json`
- **Installing Superpowers for OpenCode**（documentation）：Installing Superpowers for OpenCode 证据：`.opencode/INSTALL.md`
- **Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs**（skill_instruction）：Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue. 证据：`skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md`
- **Dispatching Parallel Agents**（skill_instruction）：You delegate tasks to specialized agents with isolated context. By precisely crafting their instructions and context, you ensure they stay focused and succeed at their task. They should never inherit your session's context or history — you construct exactly what they need. This also preserves your own context for coordination work. 证据：`skills/dispatching-parallel-agents/SKILL.md`
- **Executing Plans**（skill_instruction）：Load plan, review critically, execute all tasks, report when complete. 证据：`skills/executing-plans/SKILL.md`
- **Finishing a Development Branch**（skill_instruction）：Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow. 证据：`skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md`
- **Code Review Reception**（skill_instruction）：Code review requires technical evaluation, not emotional performance. 证据：`skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md`
- **Requesting Code Review**（skill_instruction）：Dispatch a code reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work. 证据：`skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md`
- **Subagent-Driven Development**（skill_instruction）：Execute plan by dispatching fresh subagent per task, with two-stage review after each: spec compliance review first, then code quality review. 证据：`skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md`
- **Systematic Debugging**（skill_instruction）：Random fixes waste time and create new bugs. Quick patches mask underlying issues. 证据：`skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md`
- **Using Git Worktrees**（skill_instruction）：Ensure work happens in an isolated workspace. Prefer your platform's native worktree tools. Fall back to manual git worktrees only when no native tool is available. 证据：`skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md`
- **Instruction Priority**（skill_instruction）：If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill. 证据：`skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md`
- **Verification Before Completion**（skill_instruction）：Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency. 证据：`skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.md`
- **Writing Plans**（skill_instruction）：Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits. 证据：`skills/writing-plans/SKILL.md`
- **Writing Skills**（skill_instruction）：Writing skills IS Test-Driven Development applied to process documentation. 证据：`skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md`
- **Marketplace**（structured_config）：{ "name": "superpowers-dev", "description": "Development marketplace for Superpowers core skills library", "owner": { "name": "Jesse Vincent", "email": "jesse@fsck.com" }, "plugins": { "name": "superpowers", "description": "Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques", "version": "5.1.0", "source": "./", "author": { "name": "Jesse Vincent", "email": "jesse@fsck.com" } } } 证据：`.claude-plugin/marketplace.json`
- **Plugin**（structured_config）：{ "name": "superpowers", "description": "Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques", "version": "5.1.0", "author": { "name": "Jesse Vincent", "email": "jesse@fsck.com" }, "homepage": "https://github.com/obra/superpowers", "repository": "https://github.com/obra/superpowers", "license": "MIT", "keywords": "skills", "tdd", "debugging", "collaboration", "best-practices", "workflows" } 证据：`.claude-plugin/plugin.json`
- **Plugin**（structured_config）：{ "name": "superpowers", "version": "5.1.0", "description": "An agentic skills framework & software development methodology that works: planning, TDD, debugging, and collaboration workflows.", "author": { "name": "Jesse Vincent", "email": "jesse@fsck.com", "url": "https://github.com/obra" }, "homepage": "https://github.com/obra/superpowers", "repository": "https://github.com/obra/superpowers", "license": "MIT", "keywords": "brainstorming", "subagent-driven-development", "skills", "planning", "tdd", "debugging", "code-review", "workflow" , "skills": "./skills/", "interface": { "displayName": "Superpowers", "shortDescription": "Planning, TDD, debugging, and delivery workflows for coding agent… 证据：`.codex-plugin/plugin.json`
- **Plugin**（structured_config）：{ "name": "superpowers", "displayName": "Superpowers", "description": "Core skills library: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques", "version": "5.1.0", "author": { "name": "Jesse Vincent", "email": "jesse@fsck.com" }, "homepage": "https://github.com/obra/superpowers", "repository": "https://github.com/obra/superpowers", "license": "MIT", "keywords": "skills", "tdd", "debugging", "collaboration", "best-practices", "workflows" , "skills": "./skills/", "agents": "./agents/", "commands": "./commands/", "hooks": "./hooks/hooks-cursor.json" } 证据：`.cursor-plugin/plugin.json`
- **Test-Driven Development TDD**（skill_instruction）：Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass. 证据：`skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md`
- **OpenCode Support Design**（documentation）：Date: 2025-11-22 Author: Bot & Jesse Status: Design Complete, Awaiting Implementation 证据：`docs/plans/2025-11-22-opencode-support-design.md`
- **OpenCode Support Implementation Plan**（documentation）：OpenCode Support Implementation Plan 证据：`docs/plans/2025-11-22-opencode-support-implementation.md`
- **Testing Superpowers Skills**（documentation）：This document describes how to test Superpowers skills, particularly the integration tests for complex skills like subagent-driven-development . 证据：`docs/testing.md`
- **License**（source_file）：Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files the "Software" , to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: 证据：`LICENSE`
- **Superpowers Release Notes**（documentation）：- Legacy slash commands removed — /brainstorm , /execute-plan , and /write-plan are gone. They were deprecated stubs that did nothing but tell the user to invoke the corresponding skill. Invoke superpowers:brainstorming , superpowers:executing-plans , and superpowers:writing-plans directly instead. 1188 - superpowers:code-reviewer named agent removed — the agent was the plugin's only named agent and was used by exactly two skills, while every other reviewer/implementer subagent in the repo dispatches general-purpose with a prompt template alongside its skill. The agent's persona and checklist have been merged into skills/requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md as a self-contained Task-dispa… 证据：`RELEASE-NOTES.md`
- **Superpowers for OpenCode**（documentation）：Complete guide for using Superpowers with OpenCode.ai https://opencode.ai . 证据：`docs/README.opencode.md`
- **Skills Improvements from User Feedback**（documentation）：Skills Improvements from User Feedback 证据：`docs/plans/2025-11-28-skills-improvements-from-user-feedback.md`
- **Visual Brainstorming Companion Implementation Plan**（documentation）：Visual Brainstorming Companion Implementation Plan 证据：`docs/plans/2026-01-17-visual-brainstorming.md`
- **Document Review System Implementation Plan**（documentation）：Document Review System Implementation Plan 证据：`docs/superpowers/plans/2026-01-22-document-review-system.md`
- **Visual Brainstorming Refactor Implementation Plan**（documentation）：Visual Brainstorming Refactor Implementation Plan 证据：`docs/superpowers/plans/2026-02-19-visual-brainstorming-refactor.md`
- **Zero-Dependency Brainstorm Server Implementation Plan**（documentation）：Zero-Dependency Brainstorm Server Implementation Plan 证据：`docs/superpowers/plans/2026-03-11-zero-dep-brainstorm-server.md`
- **Codex App Compatibility Implementation Plan**（documentation）：Codex App Compatibility Implementation Plan 证据：`docs/superpowers/plans/2026-03-23-codex-app-compatibility.md`
- **Worktree Rototill Implementation Plan**（documentation）：Worktree Rototill Implementation Plan 证据：`docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-06-worktree-rototill.md`
- **Document Review System Design**（documentation）：Add two new review stages to the superpowers workflow: 证据：`docs/superpowers/specs/2026-01-22-document-review-system-design.md`
- **Visual Brainstorming Refactor: Browser Displays, Terminal Commands**（documentation）：Visual Brainstorming Refactor: Browser Displays, Terminal Commands 证据：`docs/superpowers/specs/2026-02-19-visual-brainstorming-refactor-design.md`
- **Zero-Dependency Brainstorm Server**（documentation）：Replace the brainstorm companion server's vendored node modules express, ws, chokidar — 714 tracked files with a single zero-dependency server.js using only Node.js built-ins. 证据：`docs/superpowers/specs/2026-03-11-zero-dep-brainstorm-server-design.md`
- **Codex App Compatibility: Worktree and Finishing Skill Adaptation**（documentation）：Codex App Compatibility: Worktree and Finishing Skill Adaptation 证据：`docs/superpowers/specs/2026-03-23-codex-app-compatibility-design.md`
- **Worktree Rototill: Detect-and-Defer**（documentation）：Worktree Rototill: Detect-and-Defer 证据：`docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-06-worktree-rototill-design.md`
- **Cross-Platform Polyglot Hooks for Claude Code**（documentation）：Cross-Platform Polyglot Hooks for Claude Code 证据：`docs/windows/polyglot-hooks.md`
- **Visual Companion Guide**（documentation）：Browser-based visual brainstorming companion for showing mockups, diagrams, and options. 证据：`skills/brainstorming/visual-companion.md`
- **Plan Document Reviewer Prompt Template**（documentation）：Plan Document Reviewer Prompt Template 证据：`skills/writing-plans/plan-document-reviewer-prompt.md`
- **Testing CLAUDE.md Skills Documentation**（documentation）：Testing CLAUDE.md Skills Documentation 证据：`skills/writing-skills/examples/CLAUDE_MD_TESTING.md`
- **.Version Bump**（structured_config）：{ "files": { "path": "package.json", "field": "version" }, { "path": ".claude-plugin/plugin.json", "field": "version" }, { "path": ".cursor-plugin/plugin.json", "field": "version" }, { "path": ".codex-plugin/plugin.json", "field": "version" }, { "path": ".claude-plugin/marketplace.json", "field": "plugins.0.version" }, { "path": "gemini-extension.json", "field": "version" } , "audit": { "exclude": "CHANGELOG.md", "RELEASE-NOTES.md", "node modules", ".git", ".version-bump.json", "scripts/bump-version.sh" } } 证据：`.version-bump.json`
- **Hooks**（structured_config）：{ "hooks": { "SessionStart": { "matcher": "startup clear compact", "hooks": { "type": "command", "command": "\"${CLAUDE PLUGIN ROOT}/hooks/run-hook.cmd\" session-start", "async": false } } } } 证据：`hooks/hooks.json`
- **Check if all versions match**（source_file）：set -euo pipefail SCRIPT DIR="$ cd "$ dirname "$0" " && pwd " REPO ROOT="$ cd "$SCRIPT DIR/.." && pwd " CONFIG="$REPO ROOT/.version-bump.json" if ! -f "$CONFIG" ; then echo "error: .version-bump.json not found at $CONFIG" &2 exit 1 fi read json field { local file="$1" field="$2" local jq path jq path=$ echo "$field" sed -E 's/\. 0-9 + / \1 /g' sed 's/^/./' sed 's/\.\././g' jq -r "$jq path" "$file" } write json field { local file="$1" field="$2" value="$3" local jq path jq path=$ echo "$field" sed -E 's/\. 0-9 + / \1 /g' sed 's/^/./' sed 's/\.\././g' local tmp="${file}.tmp" jq "$jq path = \"$value\"" "$file" "$tmp" && mv "$tmp" "$file" } declared files { jq -r '.files "\ .path \t\ .field "'… 证据：`scripts/bump-version.sh`
- **Testing Skills With Subagents**（documentation）：Load this reference when: creating or editing skills, before deployment, to verify they work under pressure and resist rationalization. 证据：`skills/writing-skills/testing-skills-with-subagents.md`
- **Superpowers**（source_file）：const extractAndStripFrontmatter = content = // Normalize a path: trim whitespace, expand ~, resolve to absolute const normalizePath = p, homeDir = ⋮---- export const SuperpowersPlugin = async ⋮---- const getBootstrapContent = = ⋮---- config: async config = 证据：`.opencode/plugins/superpowers.js`
- **Server**（source_file）：// ========== WebSocket Protocol RFC 6455 ========== ⋮---- function computeAcceptKey clientKey ⋮---- function encodeFrame opcode, payload ⋮---- function decodeFrame buffer ⋮---- // ========== Configuration ========== ⋮---- // ========== Templates and Constants ========== ⋮---- // ========== Helper Functions ========== ⋮---- function isFullDocument html ⋮---- function wrapInFrame content ⋮---- function getNewestScreen ⋮---- // ========== HTTP Request Handler ========== ⋮---- function handleRequest req, res ⋮---- // ========== WebSocket Connection Handling ========== ⋮---- function handleUpgrade req, socket ⋮---- function handleMessage text ⋮---- function broadcast msg ⋮---- // ========== Act… 证据：`skills/brainstorming/scripts/server.cjs`
- **Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct**（documentation）：Contributor Covenant Code of Conduct 证据：`CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md`
- **Spec Document Reviewer Prompt Template**（documentation）：Spec Document Reviewer Prompt Template 证据：`skills/brainstorming/spec-document-reviewer-prompt.md`
- **Code Reviewer Prompt Template**（documentation）：Use this template when dispatching a code reviewer subagent. 证据：`skills/requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md`
- **Code Quality Reviewer Prompt Template**（documentation）：Code Quality Reviewer Prompt Template 证据：`skills/subagent-driven-development/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md`
- **Implementer Subagent Prompt Template**（documentation）：Implementer Subagent Prompt Template 证据：`skills/subagent-driven-development/implementer-prompt.md`
- **Spec Compliance Reviewer Prompt Template**（documentation）：Spec Compliance Reviewer Prompt Template 证据：`skills/subagent-driven-development/spec-reviewer-prompt.md`
- **Creation Log: Systematic Debugging Skill**（documentation）：Creation Log: Systematic Debugging Skill 证据：`skills/systematic-debugging/CREATION-LOG.md`
- **Condition-Based Waiting**（documentation）：Flaky tests often guess at timing with arbitrary delays. This creates race conditions where tests pass on fast machines but fail under load or in CI. 证据：`skills/systematic-debugging/condition-based-waiting.md`
- **Defense-in-Depth Validation**（documentation）：When you fix a bug caused by invalid data, adding validation at one place feels sufficient. But that single check can be bypassed by different code paths, refactoring, or mocks. 证据：`skills/systematic-debugging/defense-in-depth.md`
- 其余 19 条证据见 `AI_CONTEXT_PACK.json` 或 `EVIDENCE_INDEX.json`。

## 宿主 AI 必须遵守的规则

- **把本资产当作开工前上下文，而不是运行环境。**：AI Context Pack 只包含证据化项目理解，不包含目标项目的可执行状态。 证据：`CLAUDE.md`, `GEMINI.md`, `README.md`
- **回答用户时区分可预览内容与必须安装后才能验证的内容。**：安装前体验的消费者价值来自降低误装和误判，而不是伪装成真实运行。 证据：`CLAUDE.md`, `GEMINI.md`, `README.md`

## 用户开工前应该回答的问题

- 你准备在哪个宿主 AI 或本地环境中使用它？
- 你只是想先体验工作流，还是准备真实安装？
- 你最在意的是安装成本、输出质量、还是和现有规则的冲突？

## 验收标准

- 所有能力声明都能回指到 evidence_refs 中的文件路径。
- AI_CONTEXT_PACK.md 没有把预览包装成真实运行。
- 用户能在 3 分钟内看懂适合谁、能做什么、如何开始和风险边界。

---

## Doramagic Context Augmentation

下面内容用于强化 Repomix/AI Context Pack 主体。Human Manual 只提供阅读骨架；踩坑日志会被转成宿主 AI 必须遵守的工作约束。

## Human Manual 骨架

使用规则：这里只是项目阅读路线和显著性信号，不是事实权威。具体事实仍必须回到 repo evidence / Claim Graph。

宿主 AI 硬性规则：
- 不得把页标题、章节顺序、摘要或 importance 当作项目事实证据。
- 解释 Human Manual 骨架时，必须明确说它只是阅读路线/显著性信号。
- 能力、安装、兼容性、运行状态和风险判断必须引用 repo evidence、source path 或 Claim Graph。

- **Repository Overview and Architecture**：importance `high`
  - source_paths: README.md, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, package.json
- **Skills Library and Core Workflow**：importance `high`
  - source_paths: skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md, skills/brainstorming/scripts/server.cjs, skills/brainstorming/visual-companion.md, skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md, skills/writing-plans/SKILL.md
- **Multi-Harness Installation and Integration**：importance `high`
  - source_paths: .claude-plugin/marketplace.json, .claude-plugin/plugin.json, .codex-plugin/plugin.json, .cursor-plugin/plugin.json, .opencode/INSTALL.md
- **Operations, Releases, and Known Issues**：importance `high`
  - source_paths: RELEASE-NOTES.md, .version-bump.json, scripts/bump-version.sh, docs/testing.md, docs/plans/2025-11-22-opencode-support-design.md

## Repo Inspection Evidence / 源码检查证据

- repo_clone_verified: true
- repo_inspection_verified: true
- repo_commit: `6fd4507659784c351abbd2bc264c7162cfd386dc`
- inspected_files: `README.md`, `package.json`, `docs/testing.md`, `docs/README.opencode.md`, `docs/plans/2025-11-22-opencode-support-implementation.md`, `docs/plans/2025-11-22-opencode-support-design.md`, `docs/plans/2026-01-17-visual-brainstorming.md`, `docs/plans/2025-11-28-skills-improvements-from-user-feedback.md`, `docs/windows/polyglot-hooks.md`, `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-01-22-document-review-system.md`, `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-03-23-codex-app-compatibility.md`, `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-02-19-visual-brainstorming-refactor.md`, `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-03-11-zero-dep-brainstorm-server.md`, `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-04-06-worktree-rototill.md`, `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-06-worktree-rototill-design.md`, `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-03-23-codex-app-compatibility-design.md`, `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-03-11-zero-dep-brainstorm-server-design.md`, `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-02-19-visual-brainstorming-refactor-design.md`, `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-01-22-document-review-system-design.md`

宿主 AI 硬性规则：
- 没有 repo_clone_verified=true 时，不得声称已经读过源码。
- 没有 repo_inspection_verified=true 时，不得把 README/docs/package 文件判断写成事实。
- 没有 quick_start_verified=true 时，不得声称 Quick Start 已跑通。

## Doramagic Pitfall Constraints / 踩坑约束

这些规则来自 Doramagic 发现、验证或编译过程中的项目专属坑点。宿主 AI 必须把它们当作工作约束，而不是普通说明文字。

### Constraint 1: 来源证据：Feature Request: Hermes Agent harness support — make Superpowers skills available in native Hermes format

- Trigger: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：Feature Request: Hermes Agent harness support — make Superpowers skills available in native Hermes format
- Host AI rule: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Why it matters: 可能影响授权、密钥配置或安全边界。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_a8794497fd53411881056201b8d6df60 | https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/1581 | 来源讨论提到 python 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。
- Hard boundary: 不要把这个坑点包装成已解决、已验证或可忽略，除非后续验证证据明确证明它已经关闭。

### Constraint 2: 来源证据：feat(subagent-driven-development): accumulate learnings across tasks and feed to subsequent subagents

- Trigger: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：feat(subagent-driven-development): accumulate learnings across tasks and feed to subsequent subagents
- Host AI rule: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Why it matters: 可能影响授权、密钥配置或安全边界。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_ab70f8b1398247c2832ed51625870194 | https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/601 | 来源类型 github_issue 暴露的待验证使用条件。
- Hard boundary: 不要把这个坑点包装成已解决、已验证或可忽略，除非后续验证证据明确证明它已经关闭。

### Constraint 3: 失败模式：installation: Antigravity 2.0 support

- Trigger: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: Antigravity 2.0 support
- Host AI rule: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Antigravity 2.0 support. Context: Observed during installation or first-run setup.
- Why it matters: Developers may fail before the first successful local run: Antigravity 2.0 support
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_3cd7252f6ca5743aa06793d8258fa9c7 | https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/1636 | Antigravity 2.0 support
- Hard boundary: 不要把这个坑点包装成已解决、已验证或可忽略，除非后续验证证据明确证明它已经关闭。

### Constraint 4: 失败模式：installation: Feature Request: Hermes Agent harness support — make Superpowers skills available in native H...

- Trigger: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: Feature Request: Hermes Agent harness support — make Superpowers skills available in native Hermes format
- Host AI rule: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Feature Request: Hermes Agent harness support — make Superpowers skills available in native Hermes format. Context: Observed when using python
- Why it matters: Developers may fail before the first successful local run: Feature Request: Hermes Agent harness support — make Superpowers skills available in native Hermes format
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_38493ac5020594e127b9094db01ae917 | https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/1581 | Feature Request: Hermes Agent harness support — make Superpowers skills available in native Hermes format
- Hard boundary: 不要把这个坑点包装成已解决、已验证或可忽略，除非后续验证证据明确证明它已经关闭。

### Constraint 5: 失败模式：installation: Pi Agent package

- Trigger: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: Pi Agent package
- Host AI rule: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: Pi Agent package. Context: Observed during installation or first-run setup.
- Why it matters: Developers may fail before the first successful local run: Pi Agent package
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | fmev_81abb08cf2718798d6bf3874d5ab48d6 | https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/1685 | Pi Agent package
- Hard boundary: 不要把这个坑点包装成已解决、已验证或可忽略，除非后续验证证据明确证明它已经关闭。

### Constraint 6: 失败模式：installation: v5.0.4

- Trigger: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: v5.0.4
- Host AI rule: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: v5.0.4. Context: Observed when using node
- Why it matters: Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v5.0.4
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_release | fmev_a66cfa915699950289e6adc9ba6aa7e3 | https://github.com/obra/superpowers/releases/tag/v5.0.4 | v5.0.4
- Hard boundary: 不要把这个坑点包装成已解决、已验证或可忽略，除非后续验证证据明确证明它已经关闭。

### Constraint 7: 失败模式：installation: v5.0.7

- Trigger: Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: v5.0.7
- Host AI rule: Before packaging this project, run the relevant install/config/quickstart check for: v5.0.7. Context: Observed during installation or first-run setup.
- Why it matters: Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v5.0.7
- Evidence: failure_mode_cluster:github_release | fmev_c82f72cff463c8cee7702417638522f8 | https://github.com/obra/superpowers/releases/tag/v5.0.7 | v5.0.7
- Hard boundary: 不要把这个坑点包装成已解决、已验证或可忽略，除非后续验证证据明确证明它已经关闭。

### Constraint 8: 来源证据：Feature Request: Add a core project memory system for cross-session retrieval and recording

- Trigger: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安装相关的待验证问题：Feature Request: Add a core project memory system for cross-session retrieval and recording
- Host AI rule: 来源显示可能已有修复、规避或版本变化，说明书中必须标注适用版本。
- Why it matters: 可能影响升级、迁移或版本选择。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_92f8a9266fce437abbce3b0e8ae92679 | https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/551 | 来源类型 github_issue 暴露的待验证使用条件。
- Hard boundary: 不要把这个坑点包装成已解决、已验证或可忽略，除非后续验证证据明确证明它已经关闭。

### Constraint 9: 来源证据：Pi Agent package

- Trigger: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安装相关的待验证问题：Pi Agent package
- Host AI rule: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Why it matters: 可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_dc7595e0517f44b4b8f034a3891be1ba | https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/1685 | 来源类型 github_issue 暴露的待验证使用条件。
- Hard boundary: 不要把这个坑点包装成已解决、已验证或可忽略，除非后续验证证据明确证明它已经关闭。

### Constraint 10: 来源证据：writing-plans/brainstorming: default docs/superpowers/ location can leak internal plans into published documentation (S…

- Trigger: GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安装相关的待验证问题：writing-plans/brainstorming: default docs/superpowers/ location can leak internal plans into published documentation (Sphinx/Read the Docs)
- Host AI rule: 来源问题仍为 open，Pack Agent 需要复核是否仍影响当前版本。
- Why it matters: 可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- Evidence: community_evidence:github | cevd_1d7f3ffcaf6d457eaa212b6de6361956 | https://github.com/obra/superpowers/issues/1690 | 来源讨论提到 python 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。
- Hard boundary: 不要把这个坑点包装成已解决、已验证或可忽略，除非后续验证证据明确证明它已经关闭。