# Pitfall Log / 踩坑日志

项目：zcag/tela

摘要：发现 16 个潜在踩坑项，其中 1 个为 high/blocking；最高优先级：安全/权限坑 - 失败模式：security_permissions: Feature: Agent activity audit trail — who read/wrote what via MCP。

## 1. 安全/权限坑 · 失败模式：security_permissions: Feature: Agent activity audit trail — who read/wrote what via MCP

- 严重度：high
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：Developers should check this security_permissions risk before relying on the project: Feature: Agent activity audit trail — who read/wrote what via MCP
- 对用户的影响：Developers may expose sensitive permissions or credentials: Feature: Agent activity audit trail — who read/wrote what via MCP
- 证据：failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | https://github.com/zcag/tela/issues/9 | Feature: Agent activity audit trail — who read/wrote what via MCP, failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | https://github.com/zcag/tela/issues/9 | Feature: Agent activity audit trail — who read/wrote what via MCP

## 2. 安装坑 · 失败模式：installation: v0.8.0

- 严重度：medium
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：Developers should check this installation risk before relying on the project: v0.8.0
- 对用户的影响：Upgrade or migration may change expected behavior: v0.8.0
- 证据：failure_mode_cluster:github_release | https://github.com/zcag/tela/releases/tag/v0.8.0 | v0.8.0

## 3. 安装坑 · 来源证据：SEO completeness pass — landing meta/OG/schema + robots/sitemap/llms + app noindex

- 严重度：medium
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安装相关的待验证问题：SEO completeness pass — landing meta/OG/schema + robots/sitemap/llms + app noindex
- 对用户的影响：可能增加新用户试用和生产接入成本。
- 证据：community_evidence:github | https://github.com/zcag/tela/issues/2 | 来源讨论提到 npm 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。

## 4. 配置坑 · 可能修改宿主 AI 配置

- 严重度：medium
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：项目面向 Claude/Cursor/Codex/Gemini/OpenCode 等宿主，或安装命令涉及用户配置目录。
- 对用户的影响：安装可能改变本机 AI 工具行为，用户需要知道写入位置和回滚方法。
- 证据：capability.host_targets | https://github.com/zcag/tela | host_targets=mcp_host, claude, cursor

## 5. 配置坑 · 失败模式：configuration: Reading mode — chrome-free, typographically elevated page reader

- 严重度：medium
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：Developers should check this configuration risk before relying on the project: Reading mode — chrome-free, typographically elevated page reader
- 对用户的影响：Developers may misconfigure credentials, environment, or host setup: Reading mode — chrome-free, typographically elevated page reader
- 证据：failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | https://github.com/zcag/tela/issues/3 | Reading mode — chrome-free, typographically elevated page reader, failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | https://github.com/zcag/tela/issues/3 | Reading mode — chrome-free, typographically elevated page reader

## 6. 能力坑 · 能力判断依赖假设

- 严重度：medium
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：README/documentation is current enough for a first validation pass.
- 对用户的影响：假设不成立时，用户拿不到承诺的能力。
- 证据：capability.assumptions | https://github.com/zcag/tela | README/documentation is current enough for a first validation pass.

## 7. 维护坑 · 维护活跃度未知

- 严重度：medium
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：未记录 last_activity_observed。
- 对用户的影响：新项目、停更项目和活跃项目会被混在一起，推荐信任度下降。
- 证据：evidence.maintainer_signals | https://github.com/zcag/tela | last_activity_observed missing

- 严重度：medium
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：no_demo
- 证据：downstream_validation.risk_items | https://github.com/zcag/tela | no_demo; severity=medium

## 9. 安全/权限坑 · 存在评分风险

- 严重度：medium
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：no_demo
- 对用户的影响：风险会影响是否适合普通用户安装。
- 证据：risks.scoring_risks | https://github.com/zcag/tela | no_demo; severity=medium

## 10. 安全/权限坑 · 来源证据：Feature: Agent activity audit trail — who read/wrote what via MCP

- 严重度：medium
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：Feature: Agent activity audit trail — who read/wrote what via MCP
- 对用户的影响：可能影响授权、密钥配置或安全边界。
- 证据：community_evidence:github | https://github.com/zcag/tela/issues/9 | 来源类型 github_issue 暴露的待验证使用条件。

## 11. 安全/权限坑 · 来源证据：Marketing landing page (standalone Astro) + apex deploy routing

- 严重度：medium
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：Marketing landing page (standalone Astro) + apex deploy routing
- 对用户的影响：可能影响授权、密钥配置或安全边界。
- 证据：community_evidence:github | https://github.com/zcag/tela/issues/1 | 来源讨论提到 docker 相关条件，需在安装/试用前复核。

## 12. 安全/权限坑 · 来源证据：Reading mode — chrome-free, typographically elevated page reader

- 严重度：medium
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：GitHub 社区证据显示该项目存在一个安全/权限相关的待验证问题：Reading mode — chrome-free, typographically elevated page reader
- 对用户的影响：可能影响授权、密钥配置或安全边界。
- 证据：community_evidence:github | https://github.com/zcag/tela/issues/3 | 来源类型 github_issue 暴露的待验证使用条件。

## 13. 能力坑 · 失败模式：capability: SEO completeness pass — landing meta/OG/schema + robots/sitemap/llms + app noindex

- 严重度：low
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：Developers should check this capability risk before relying on the project: SEO completeness pass — landing meta/OG/schema + robots/sitemap/llms + app noindex
- 对用户的影响：Developers may hit a documented source-backed failure mode: SEO completeness pass — landing meta/OG/schema + robots/sitemap/llms + app noindex
- 证据：failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | https://github.com/zcag/tela/issues/2 | SEO completeness pass — landing meta/OG/schema + robots/sitemap/llms + app noindex, failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | https://github.com/zcag/tela/issues/2 | SEO completeness pass — landing meta/OG/schema + robots/sitemap/llms + app noindex

## 14. 能力坑 · 失败模式：conceptual: Marketing landing page (standalone Astro) + apex deploy routing

- 严重度：low
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：Developers should check this conceptual risk before relying on the project: Marketing landing page (standalone Astro) + apex deploy routing
- 对用户的影响：Developers may hit a documented source-backed failure mode: Marketing landing page (standalone Astro) + apex deploy routing
- 证据：failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | https://github.com/zcag/tela/issues/1 | Marketing landing page (standalone Astro) + apex deploy routing, failure_mode_cluster:github_issue | https://github.com/zcag/tela/issues/1 | Marketing landing page (standalone Astro) + apex deploy routing

## 15. 维护坑 · issue/PR 响应质量未知

- 严重度：low
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：issue_or_pr_quality=unknown。
- 对用户的影响：用户无法判断遇到问题后是否有人维护。
- 证据：evidence.maintainer_signals | https://github.com/zcag/tela | issue_or_pr_quality=unknown

## 16. 维护坑 · 发布节奏不明确

- 严重度：low
- 证据强度：source_linked
- 发现：release_recency=unknown。
- 对用户的影响：安装命令和文档可能落后于代码，用户踩坑概率升高。
- 证据：evidence.maintainer_signals | https://github.com/zcag/tela | release_recency=unknown